Results 1 to 1 of 1

Math Help - Maxwell equations example

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Joined
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4

    Maxwell equations example

    Hi,

    I'm currently trying to understand how to solve Maxwells equations analytically. I have some questions and would like to know if I'm doing things right!

    I want to solve a simple(?) example: Lets say we have an infinte cylinder in free space with axis in z direction. The cylinder should be a homogeneous, isotropic dielectric (or pec as a second example). I'm searching for time-harmonic solutions, so the electric field should be E(r,t)=E(r)e^{-i\omega t}. The problem is to find the scattered (and the transmitted) field for an incident plane wave travelling in x direction and having only z component: E(r)=(0,0,e^{-i\omega x}).

    Is the problem description complete?

    In free space with vanishing charge and current density the components of the electric field satisfy the scalar wave equation. So, with c := 1/\sqrt{\mu\epsilon} we get

    \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}\vect{E} - \Delta E = 0

    With harmonic time dependence this is the homogeneous Helmholtz equation

    \Delta \vect{E} + \frac{\omega^2}{c^2}\vect{E} = 0,

    which I will write

    A \Delta \vect{E} + \omega^2\vect{E} = 0,

    so the constant A describes the material parameters.

    The above 3D problem can be reduced to a 2D one (Is that right? What is the mathematical argument for that?). I want to solve the Helmholtz equation in the xy plane, with boundary conditions given by the incident wave, for example neumann conditions: \partial_n u(x,y) = -i\omega e^{-i\omega x}\nu_1 for (x,y)\in \partial\Omega.

    The scattered field will be given by solving outside the cylinder with c = c_0 and the transmitted field by solving inside the cylinder with c given by the material parameters. Is that right?

    When solving in polar coordinates, solutions to the problem are given by

    u = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} a_n J_n(A \omega r) e^{in\theta} inside the cylinder
    u = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} [b_n J_n(\omega r)+c_n H_n^{(1)}(\omega r)] e^{in\theta} outside (assumed A=1)

    I found those solutions in an online paper. Some questions:

    * How do I get those equations? Haven't found them in any book so far.
    * What's the meaning of the Hankel function H_n^{(1)}?
    * How would I calculate the coefficients a_n, b_n and c_n? I think for any n they are given by the boundary conditions - so it should be a linear 3x3 system. But what exactly does it look like?

    For a perfect electric conductor: what would change? What would the boundary conditions look like?

    And the last question has to be: how can I be sure, that the linear system is not singular? I think the above solution holds, if -\omega^2 is not an eigenvalue of the Laplacian with Neumann data. But wouldn't it be possible, to find material parameters A so that the linear system is singular for some n. What would be the effect of that (physically)???

    Thanks!
    Last edited by brandon86; September 8th 2010 at 07:03 AM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Expected value of Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
    Posted in the Advanced Statistics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 15th 2010, 03:25 PM
  2. maxwell distribution exercise
    Posted in the Math Topics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 21st 2009, 05:42 AM
  3. Maxwell-Boltzmann law-urgent
    Posted in the Advanced Statistics Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: March 1st 2009, 10:24 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 27th 2009, 07:05 PM
  5. Maxwell Relations
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: February 11th 2009, 03:10 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum