How can I solve the following differential equation using power series?

(1 – x^2)y'' – 6xy' – 4y = 0

I know there are other ways to solve this, but I specifically need to know how to do these using power series. (Headbang)

Printable View

- Jul 23rd 2010, 09:27 AMEmilyLSolve differential equation using "Power Series"
How can I solve the following differential equation using power series?

(1 – x^2)y'' – 6xy' – 4y = 0

I know there are other ways to solve this, but I specifically need to know how to do these using power series. (Headbang) - Jul 23rd 2010, 09:38 AMlvleph
This is just a guess, but maybe rewriting the DEQ as

Rewrite the fractions as a power series, and then solve? - Jul 23rd 2010, 09:43 AMAckbeet
Well, maybe. Most likely what is intended is to assume a solution of the form

plug that into the DE, and turn the crank. Am I right, EmilyL? - Jul 23rd 2010, 09:49 AMlvleph
That sound more like it.

- Jul 23rd 2010, 09:50 AMEmilyL
- Jul 23rd 2010, 09:57 AMAckbeet
Sure. What happens when you plug this expression into the DE?

- Jul 23rd 2010, 10:07 AMEmilyL
What are you using to type out the equations so neatly? Do you need to know the code, or is there something that does it for you?

For plugging into the DE, I'm not sure what exactly to plug in. For the y, I think its what you showed in the previous post. For the y', it is ncx^(n-1) and for y'' it is n(n-1)cx^(n-1), right? Other than that, is there any more plugging in / substituting to do? - Jul 23rd 2010, 10:27 AMAckbeet
Right. In order to type up equations in LaTeX, which is what all those nice-looking equations are in, you have to double-click the Reply to Thread option, or click the Go Advanced button after single-clicking Reply to Thread. That brings you to a new screen, where you can click the button that looks like TeX, close to the far right. That will produce a math environment starting and ending brackets. What you type in-between those brackets gets interpreted as LaTeX code. The best way to learn LaTeX is by doing and observing. On this forum, you can double-click formulas to see how somebody typed them. Another little trick: after double-clicking to see LaTeX source code, you can copy and paste the code for yourself. Saves oodles of time!

So, you've got your original DE thus:

as well as your series ansatz (ansatz is a terrific German word often used in the context of DE's. It means "your original guess" or "working hypothesis" for the purposes of computation) as follows:

to use your teacher's notation.

Plugging the ansatz into the DE is close to what you said, but not quite. You have

as you said, but

Now these series don't really start at n=0 for the derivatives, do they? The and multiplying stuff changes it to the following:

and

So plugging that into the DE produces the following:

What happens next? - Jul 23rd 2010, 10:41 AMEmilyL
I'm not sure. The example in my book indicates that I would substitute k=n-2, k=n-1, and k=n for each series respectively. However, I'm not sure why that is done and what that achieves

- Jul 23rd 2010, 10:51 AMAckbeet
The reason that's the next step is that what you want to do is add all the series together, gather like terms, etc. You can't do that if the series don't all start at the same beginning value. Each series, currently, isn't on the same page with everyone else. So, what do you get when you make those substitutions?

- Jul 23rd 2010, 11:49 AMEmilyL

right?

I'm not sure how you are allowed to substitute different values for n into the same equation. How can one variable have different values within the same equation? - Jul 23rd 2010, 11:51 AMAckbeet
I think you're confused about the shifting. Take the first series: if k = n - 2, then n = k + 2. Just plug that in. What do you get?

- Jul 23rd 2010, 11:56 AMEmilyL
you're right, I edited my previous post, now getting k=0 for the starting point of each sum

- Jul 23rd 2010, 12:00 PMAckbeet
Close, very close. I'd clean it up just a bit more:

Now what? - Jul 23rd 2010, 12:04 PMEmilyL
Now you can put them all together since the boundaries are the same, right?

Not sure if I dealt with the coefficients right.

Also, can I get rid of the "sum" sign now?