First let me define the Fourier Transform of f to be
I am trying to transform, but I haven't a clue where to begin here. I am sure that I am just not seeing some trick. Thanks in advance.
Printable View
First let me define the Fourier Transform of f to be
I am trying to transform, but I haven't a clue where to begin here. I am sure that I am just not seeing some trick. Thanks in advance.
Theterm you can handle by using line 107 here. The sin function you can handle by line 305 on the same page. It's not pretty, but you can get a closed-form expression for your function, despite not being square-integrable.
Ok. Try by-parts, withbeing
, and
Integrating your
will itself require by-parts. Then you'll have to do the process all over again. That should get rid of the powers of x out front. What do you get after that?
Let's see if I am getting this right
Let,
and so we have
Hmm. Check your dv integration. You have to do by-parts twice on functions like that in order to get back to your original integral. You then pull it over to the other side and solve for it. You follow?
[EDIT]: Also, check whether you're computing definite or indefinite integrals, and where you're doing that. Don't mix them up!
I was just checking my steps.
Now I just have to do the next steps. Thank you for your help.
Correct. Now just turn the crank.
So the next problem is thatis not convergent.
Hmm. Are you sure you need to compute that? Finish computing the integral of dv. Then write out your outer by-parts, and type that up. Let me see what you have there.
Reply to CB at Post # 11:
Well, I was hoping that through the computations being done above, we'd be able to get to the point of recognizing the integrals that are left as the second derivatives of the Dirac Delta function. There is an inverse FT for that function:
Spoiler:
I know I'm showing my ignorance of distribution theory here (which is no more than the truth), but how has the OP excluded distributions from the allowed solutions?Quote:
...the OP has excluded that approach
Post #3. You need a non-standard definition of an integral to do this as an intergral, and I'm pretty sure the OP has never seen such a definition (of course the OP may be an engineering student, in which case the lecturer may just wave their hands over such things and >POOFF< there it is).
CB