subject to boundary conditions :

I have never done direct integration with this " mix " of order, how do i go about it ?!

Printable View

- Apr 17th 2010, 08:34 AMpunkstartfind the solution of this PDE !

subject to boundary conditions :

I have never done direct integration with this " mix " of order, how do i go about it ?! - Apr 17th 2010, 09:01 AMHallsofIvy

so that is constant with respect to x- that is, where f is an arbitrary function of y only.

Now treat as an ordinary differential equation in y. It is a first order, linear, differential equation so it can be integrated using an "integrating factor"- that is, a function such that .

since we must have or , and .

That is, so that where F(y) is an anti-derivative of f. Since f was arbitrary, F is any arbitrary (differentiable) function of y. However, since we have been doing this with y only, treating x as a constant, that "constant of integration", C, may be an arbitrary function of x-

so where F and G can be any arbitrary differentiable functions.

(Yes, just as the solutions to ordinary differential equations involve unknown constants, so the solutions to partial differential equations involve unknown**functions**).

Now, use the additional conditions (of which you don't have enough):

so . Now you have but you still need another condition, perhaps something of the form u(0,y)= f(y), to determine F(y). - Apr 18th 2010, 04:09 AMpunkstartSolved !
Thanx HallsofIvy,i used the integrating factor( i don't think i would have thought of that,since never tried to solve a PDE by making it first order!) and with a little manipulation got my answer. Apparently i can't pm yet, but you can verify that the solution is

The key here was that you can rename the product of F(y) and the integrating factor,as G(y) since the product still only depends on y,then the condition on gives the equation it is easy to find the value of G from here, then the last condition makes it easy to find the function in x. - Apr 18th 2010, 07:13 AMJester
Your answer is correct! Another way would do is something a little different. I'd let so the PDE is

and the second BC is so .

The PDE is separable so the solution is

and with the BC gives .

Thus far

Then and integrating gives

Now use the first BC

. This is an ODE for G which can be solved by ODE methods. - Apr 19th 2010, 11:06 AMpunkstartMuch simpler ! Thank you!
Will remember that aproach!