Hi again, here's another question that I had a go at but haven't got any answers for, does the working and answer seem ok?
Solve
The method I use is outlined in my lecture notes, however I am unsure of it's actual name.
First thing I did was to isolate the x term on the right hand side by multiplying everything by, giving the equation
I then use the substitution of, then differentiate this equation with respect to x and you get
.
Placing these two substitutions into my original equation this simplifies to be.
I wasn't too sure what to do at this point, I took a guess at using an integrating factor of, which when I put back into the equation gave me
.
This then integrates to, which after putting back in my substitution gave the answer of
.
Is any of this correct, or know me have I made an early error and then just answered a completely different question?
Thanks again
Craig


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



