Hi, does anyone happen to know how to prove this equality.

Let , then

Printable View

- June 6th 2009, 06:21 PMnonsingularLaplace Transform
Hi, does anyone happen to know how to prove this equality.

Let , then - June 6th 2009, 06:44 PMNonCommAlg
- June 6th 2009, 07:09 PMnonsingular
I checked again to see that I did not type the problem incorrectly. Also I looked up Schaum's Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables by Murray Spiegel, and on page 182, the Laplace Transform 33.23 concurred with my original problem. Hence, may you please post your solution to see how you got your answer? Thanks.

An abridged version of Spiegel's book can be found here Schaum's Outline of Mathematical ... - Google Book Search - June 6th 2009, 07:42 PMNonCommAlg
- June 6th 2009, 08:19 PMmr fantastic
Not that you need a humble ant like me confirming your solution, but when I originally saw this question that's exactly what I was going to post but didn't have the time.

@OP: I really like the Schaum's Outline Series but this wouldn't be the first time I've come across a typo (my edition of the Laplace Transforms book in this series has hundreds). - June 7th 2009, 04:47 AMnonsingular
Thanks for the help.