Results 1 to 8 of 8

Math Help - Need help with integral another proof

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Joined
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    22

    Need help with integral another proof

    If f(x)>0 for all xElement-ofsymbol [a,b], then
    b
    Integral sign f>0
    a

    a) Give an example where f(x)>0 for all xElement-ofsymbol [a,b], and f(x)>0 for some xElement-ofsymbol [a,b], and

    b
    Integral sign f=0
    a

    b) Suppose that f(x)>0 for all xElement-of symbol[a,b] and f is continous on at x0 in [a,b] and f(x0)>0. Proove that

    b
    Integral sign f>0
    a
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    18,616
    Thanks
    1579
    Awards
    1
    I will give you some hints for part b.
    Because f is continuous, there is a subinterval of [a,b] on which f(x) > \frac{{f\left( {x_0 } \right)}}{2}.
    To see how this works note that:
    \varepsilon  = \frac{{f\left( {x_0 } \right)}}{2}
    \exists \delta \left[ {\left| {x - x_0 } \right| < \delta } \right]\quad  \Rightarrow \quad \left| {f(x) - f(x_0 )} \right| < \varepsilon .
    Last edited by Plato; December 19th 2006 at 02:23 PM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Super Member

    Joined
    May 2006
    From
    Lexington, MA (USA)
    Posts
    11,710
    Thanks
    630
    Hello, Swamifez!

    I'll state the problem in LaTex ... maybe someone can help you.


    If f(x) \geq 0\;\;\forall x \in [a,b], .then: . \int^b_af(x)\,dx \:> \:0

    a) Give an example where f(x) \geq 0\:\;\forall x \in [a,b], and f(x) > 0\;\;\exists x \in [a,b],
    . . and \int^b_af(x)\,dx\;=\;0

    b) Suppose that f(x) \geq 0\;\;\forall x \in [a,b] and f is continous at x_o \in [a,b], and f(x_o) > 0.
    Prove that: . \int^b_af(x)\,dx\:>\:0

    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    Global Moderator

    Joined
    Nov 2005
    From
    New York City
    Posts
    10,616
    Thanks
    9
    If f(x) \geq 0\;\;\forall x \in [a,b], .then: . \int^b_af(x)\,dx \:> \:0

    a) Give an example where f(x) \geq 0\:\;\forall x \in [a,b], and f(x) > 0\;\;\exists x \in [a,b],
    . . and \int^b_af(x)\,dx\;=\;0

    b) Suppose that f(x) \geq 0\;\;\forall x \in [a,b] and f is continous at x_o \in [a,b], and f(x_o) > 0.
    Prove that: . \int^b_af(x)\,dx\:>\:0
    Have you ever heard of the "Limit-Limitation Theorem".
    It states that if f(x)\geq 0 and \lim_{x\to c}f(x) exists then the limit value is non-negative. (Note c can also be limits at infinity).

    Now, the integral is the limit of the Riemann sum. The rest is trivial.

    For you other question,
    Consider,
    f(x)=\left\{ \begin{array}{c}0, \mbox{ for }-1\leq x<0\\ 1, \mbox{ for }x=0 \\ 0, \mbox{ for }0<x\leq 1\end{array} \right\}
    This function is not always zero.
    And because it is continous almost everywhere,
    \int_{-1}^1f(x)dx=0
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Joined
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    22
    Test preparation... Can someone help me sum up this problem into one juicy proof justifying all the the steps in part a. In part be can someone help me show lower sum is >0 and bigger than the supremum and some it up in one big proof.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  6. #6
    Newbie
    Joined
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    22
    More help with this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  7. #7
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    18,616
    Thanks
    1579
    Awards
    1
    Are you doing an online or a take-home test?
    I think that if you are being tested on these concepts then you should have a better grasp of the proof than your postings indicate.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  8. #8
    Newbie
    Joined
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    22
    Plato, neither, the class is officially over and the tests were all inclass, so I couldn't have asked for either. I want to understand each concept, each step by step, so if I take another proof class, it won't be that bad.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. [SOLVED] Integral proof ..
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: July 15th 2010, 03:25 PM
  2. Integral Proof
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: May 14th 2010, 03:29 AM
  3. Integral proof
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: June 17th 2009, 05:30 AM
  4. Help with Integral proof
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 21st 2009, 06:09 PM
  5. Replies: 6
    Last Post: August 4th 2007, 09:48 AM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum