How would I change this problem into a series and evaluate the limit?

(e^x) - 1

--------

sinx

any help greatly appreciated as I'm completely stuck.

Printable View

- May 7th 2009, 08:54 AMryu991using a series to evaluate a limit:
How would I change this problem into a series and evaluate the limit?

(e^x) - 1

--------

sinx

any help greatly appreciated as I'm completely stuck. - May 7th 2009, 09:11 AMHallsofIvy
The MacLaurin series for [tex]e^x is 1+ x+x^2/2+ x^3/3!+ ...

What do you get when you subtract 1 from that.

The MacLaurin series for sin(x) is x- x^3/3!+ x^5/5!+ .... If you divide the previous series by that, do you see that you can cancel an "x"? Then, as x goes to 0, all but the constant terms will disappear. - May 7th 2009, 09:49 AMryu991
ok, so the first x's cancel and then as I divide. (x^2/2! divided by -x^3/3! etc...)

I wind up with:

-3x^-1 + 20x ^-2 - 210x^ -3 etc....

So 2 things:

1) is my division right? there is clearly a pattern just not sure if its the right one.

2) If it is right do I just need to take the derivative of each and calculate the limit from there or is there more i'm missing?

edit: as x goes to 0 how would all the x's dissapear. Wouldnt I just get a bunch of 0 over 0's? - May 7th 2009, 09:58 AMSpec
- May 7th 2009, 10:06 AMryu991
- May 7th 2009, 10:21 AMSpec
Instead of messing around with all the terms, you can simply say that with an error smaller than as , where is a constant. In particular, for all .

- May 7th 2009, 10:25 AMryu991
- May 7th 2009, 10:36 AMSpec
It's basically the same thing. I have just truncated the Maclaurin series for and a bit so you don't have to write out all the terms. You can of course still write it like this:

- May 7th 2009, 10:38 AMryu991
I think I got the first part, I write out all the terms in the form you did, but I'm confused as to what to do from there.

Why does it all equal to 1? - May 7th 2009, 10:58 AMSpec
All the x terms vanish as x goes to zero.

- May 7th 2009, 11:01 AMryu991
1st off thanks for all the help.

2nd, and this is the same question I asked the other guy..

why do all the x terms vanish. As x approaches 0 wouldnt we be stuck with a bunch of 0 over 0's?

I know the limit is 1 because I already did it with l' hospital but I just dont understand how the x's vanish and why the series does not wind up in an inderteminate form. - May 7th 2009, 11:34 AMSpec
No, because you have where is a sum of x terms that goes to zero as x goes to zero. So the limit becomes

- May 7th 2009, 11:44 AMryu991