what should my thought process be when evaluating this integtral, where I have a fairly large x in front of a third root? Where do I start?
Just in case a picture helps...
...where straight continuous lines differentiate down / integrate up with respect to the explicit variable, and the staight dashed line with respect to the dashed balloon expression, so that the triangular network satisfies the chain rule. Integrating up the dashed is like finding F(u), and for this we can do...
This still contains many of the algebra connections that were mystifying you, but you may find it helpful to get this kind of overview.
(Krizalid - respect to the policy of dealing with the cube root in the substitution - but does it really help in this case? The OP's sub of seems to work fine. I did a similar picture for and it's alot messier. My written version, too, though maybe not your's. Anyway, hope you don't mind me giving the pot another stir.)
Don't integrate - balloontegrate!
Balloon Calculus: worked examples from past papers
My "thought process" is "I sure would like to get rid of that inside the cube root. What would happen if I tried ". Then I would find that or . The "1/8" is a constant so I can alway put in but where am I going to get that from?
That's when I look at the and write it as [tex](x^8)(x^3}= (x^4)^2 (x^3)[tex].
Now I recognize that since , and so .
Putting that all together,
Now write that as and you have
which should be easy.