HI

Can anyone please tell me what is meant by that symbol between X and X ? I can do the questions myself but I dont know how to interprete that?

http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/8/26200914210pmzs8.png

Thanks

Printable View

- February 5th 2009, 11:13 PMchamprockWhat does this symbol mean?
HI

Can anyone please tell me what is meant by that symbol between X and X ? I can do the questions myself but I dont know how to interprete that?

http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/8/26200914210pmzs8.png

Thanks - February 6th 2009, 02:45 AMmr fantastic
Read this: Elementary Calculus: Absolute Value Function

- February 6th 2009, 05:19 AMchamprock
oh ya i know absolute function. somehow i got confused and thought it was something else. just for confirmation , the answer is B right? it is a continous function everywhere and differentiable everywhere. But it is not differentiable at x=0?

Thanks a lot - February 6th 2009, 06:13 AMHallsofIvy
- February 6th 2009, 06:40 AMchamprock
hmm ur proof definately means that it is not continous. but i got this diagram drawn up from mathematica

http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/770...90901pmjx8.png

seems continous to me? - February 8th 2009, 01:25 AMchamprock
i studied on continuity and thanks for pointing out that mistake of mine.

But , I am again stuck. Going by the logic of the previous question, the following function should also be:

1. Continous everywhere but Not continous at x=0

2. Differentiable everywhere except x=0

But this is not an option at all in the question. can you please guide me on this? (Again, I am not asking for an answer, but just help which can probably help me figure out the thing myself.)

http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/2...34207pmok5.png

http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/6...34207pmkh1.png - February 8th 2009, 06:51 AMHallsofIvy
- February 8th 2009, 08:16 PMchamprock
Hi HallsofIvy

Actually they were both different questions. I am slightly confused. http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/4...34207pmhk9.png

In the first question, the right hand limit was positive (+h) and the left hand side limit was negative (-h). That is why the function was not continous at x=0 because RHL will not be equal to LHL

Following the same reasoning, in the second question, the right hand limit is positive (h*e^-h) and the left hand limit is negative (-h*e^-h). {since e^-h is positive always) So, the RHL is not equal to LHL in this case also. So, it is not continous?

(I know something is wrong in the above reasoning, can you please clarify it?)

Thanks - February 9th 2009, 08:31 AMchamprock
any opinions?

- February 9th 2009, 12:25 PMHallsofIvy
No, no, no! the limit with h positive is and that goes to 0(1)= 0. The limit with h negative is [tex]\frac{h^2}{-h}e^{-h}= -he^{-h} and that goes to -(0)(1)= 0.

Quote:

Following the same reasoning, in the second question, the right hand limit is positive (h*e^-h) and the left hand limit is negative (-h*e^-h). {since e^-h is positive always) So, the RHL is not equal to LHL in this case also. So, it is not continous?

Quote:

(I know something is wrong in the above reasoning, can you please clarify it?)

Thanks

- February 10th 2009, 06:01 AMchamprock
well, if the two limits (RHL and LHL) are 0 for both the questions then both the functions are continous for all X? ? Is there anything wrong in this?