Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: continuety parameter question..

  1. #1
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,401

    continuety parameter question..

    i tried to solve it
    but i didnt get any parameter value
    ??
    Last edited by transgalactic; January 18th 2009 at 12:54 PM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Lord of certain Rings
    Isomorphism's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    IISc, Bangalore
    Posts
    1,460


    Here's a thought: what happens when m=0 ?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,401
    0^0 *bounded is an undefined form
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    Lord of certain Rings
    Isomorphism's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    IISc, Bangalore
    Posts
    1,460
    Quote Originally Posted by transgalactic View Post
    0^0 *bounded is an undefined form
    Look carefully... the definition x^m \sin \frac1{x} holds only for x \neq 0. You cant simply substitute 0 in the place of x to check for continuity.

    Thus your problem for m = 0 reads:

    f(x) = \begin{cases} \sin \frac1{x} & x\neq 0 \\ 0 & x = 0 \end{cases}

    Is f(x) continuous at x = 0?

    (This is a very popular problem. I am sure you would have seen it somewhere in your notes/text)
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,401
    ok so its 1*bounded wich is not defined either

    ??
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  6. #6
    Lord of certain Rings
    Isomorphism's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    IISc, Bangalore
    Posts
    1,460
    Quote Originally Posted by transgalactic View Post
    ok so its 1*bounded wich is not defined either

    ??
    The function is well defined. The point of my post was to ask if f(x) is continuous at 0. I claim it is not. Can you prove it?

    To prove it is discontinuous at 0, observe that sequence x_n = \frac{2}{(2n+1)\pi} converges to 0, but f(x_n) = (-1)^n
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  7. #7
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,401
    how does it finds the values of the m parameter
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  8. #8
    Lord of certain Rings
    Isomorphism's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    IISc, Bangalore
    Posts
    1,460
    First prove the following result:

    (*) \lim_{x \to 0} x^m \sin \frac1{x} exists and equal to 0 iff m > 0.

    Now for part (A) we need to find m for which \lim_{x \to 0} f(x) = f(0) = 0, Thus we need m for which \lim_{x \to 0} x^m \sin \frac1{x} = 0. From the result (*), this happens iff m > 0.

    For part (B), we need values of 'm' for which \lim_{x \to 0}\frac{f(x) - f(0)}{x - 0} exists. But \lim_{x \to 0}\frac{f(x) - f(0)}{x - 0} = x^{m-1} \sin \frac1{x}. Again by the result, the limit exists iff m-1 > 0 \implies m > 1

    Do part (C) yourself, its instructive
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  9. #9
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,401
    its seems you already answered C
    by solving A and B
    it is continues on x=0 when m>0
    it is differentiable on x=0 when m>1
    so its continuously differentiable on m>1

    thats the correct solution?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  10. #10
    Lord of certain Rings
    Isomorphism's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    IISc, Bangalore
    Posts
    1,460
    Quote Originally Posted by transgalactic View Post
    its seems you already answered C
    by solving A and B
    it is continues on x=0 when m>0
    it is differentiable on x=0 when m>1
    so its continuously differentiable on m>1

    thats the correct solution?
    No! A function is continuously differentiable at x = 0 means the derivative at 0 exists and the derivative is continuous at 0 ! I never proved any result about the derivative!

    Ok I will do the last one too... But I will let you prove some statements on your own.

    Since we have already proved that m > 1 iff f(x) is differentiable at x = 0, for continuous differentiability we need m > 1.
    f'(x) = x^{m-2} \left(mx \sin \frac1{x} - \cos \frac1{x}\right)

    Now first prove that if m > 2, then the function f'(x) is continuous at 0, using (*) and making a similar rule for \lim_{x \to 0} x^m \cos \frac1{x}(prove this too!).

    Now the only remaining case is m=2. For this case,  f'(x) = \begin{cases} 2x\sin \frac1{x} - \cos \frac1{x} & x \neq 0 \\ 0 & x = 0 \end{cases}.

    Choose the sequence x_n = \frac1{n \pi}, and observe that x_n \to 0 but f(x_n) = -(-1)^n. Thus f(x) is not continuously differentiable at x = 0.

    So at the end, let me list the exercises you have to do, to complete the proof rigorously:

    (*) exists and equal to 0 iff m > 0

    (**) f'(x) = x^{m-2} \left(mx \sin \frac1{x} - \cos \frac1{x}\right)

    (***) \lim_{x \to 0} x^m \cos \frac1{x} exists and equal to 0 iff m > 0

    (****) Using (**) and (***), prove that if m > 2, then f'(x) is continuous at x = 0

    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  11. #11
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,401
    (*) exists and equal to 0 iff m > 0

    the only way to prove it
    is by cheching the cases of m.
    if m<0 then as x goes to zero and m is negative
    we get 0.
    so the whole limit would be
    0*bouded which is bound
    so i think i found a mistake in your theory
    its working for m differs 0
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  12. #12
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,401
    i got a solution to A
    and it says
    some thing about

    if m=0 then
    <br /> <br />
x_n = \frac{1}{(2n)\pi} <br />
    i dont know how they came up with this Xn
    and what i need to do with it
    ??
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  13. #13
    Lord of certain Rings
    Isomorphism's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    IISc, Bangalore
    Posts
    1,460
    Quote Originally Posted by transgalactic View Post
    (*) exists and equal to 0 iff m > 0

    the only way to prove it
    is by cheching the cases of m.
    if m<0 then as x goes to zero and m is negative
    we get 0.
    so the whole limit would be
    0*bouded which is bound
    so i think i found a mistake in your theory
    its working for m differs 0
    Read the question again. It explicitly "shouts" m \geq 0.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  14. #14
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,401
    Quote Originally Posted by transgalactic View Post
    i got a solution to A
    and it says
    some thing about

    if m=0 then
    <br /> <br />
x_n = \frac{1}{(2n)\pi} <br />
    i dont know how they came up with this Xn
    and what i need to do with it
    ??
    can you explain this thing
    ??
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  15. #15
    Lord of certain Rings
    Isomorphism's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    IISc, Bangalore
    Posts
    1,460
    Quote Originally Posted by transgalactic View Post
    can you explain this thing
    ??
    That solution you got is of no use to part A. To demonstrate discontinuity at x_0, we have to find a sequence x_n \to x_0, but the sequence f(x_n) \not \to f(x_0).

    Your sequence x_n \to 0, but f(x_n) = \sin 2n \pi = 0. So it is of no use.

    As a side note, I am really sorry transgalactic, that I am failing in explaining this concept to you. I have already given you the answer for this in my previous posts. The sequence you can use is x_n = \frac2{(2n+1)\pi}

    I am telling the following based on our discussion.....If you take it in the right spirit, I suggest you take tutions. Sometimes a live tutor teaching a new concept is an invaluable experience.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. uuniform continuety question
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 3rd 2011, 01:11 PM
  2. integral/continuety proof question..
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 24th 2009, 10:16 AM
  3. continuety prove question..
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: December 27th 2008, 06:25 AM
  4. continuety of a complex function question..
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 25th 2008, 04:12 PM
  5. integral/continuety proof question..
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 21st 2008, 10:11 AM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum