Hi there,

I wonder if you can think of any bijective function that maps [0,1) interval into R?

In case of (0,1) I've done the following: y=tan(pi*x - pi/2), but I have no idea how to deal with [0,1).

Thanks in advance for any help,

Lucas

Results 1 to 12 of 12

- October 24th 2006, 06:59 AM #1

- Joined
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 3

## f: [0,1) -> R

Hi there,

I wonder if you can think of any bijective function that maps [0,1) interval into R?

In case of (0,1) I've done the following: y=tan(pi*x - pi/2), but I have no idea how to deal with [0,1).

Thanks in advance for any help,

Lucas

- October 24th 2006, 07:33 AM #2

- October 24th 2006, 07:39 AM #3

- Joined
- Jan 2006
- From
- Brussels, Belgium
- Posts
- 405
- Thanks
- 3

- October 24th 2006, 07:40 AM #4
Actually, the domain of f does not include x = 1/2, so this isn't quite true.

My thought is that this mapping is impossible. The interval [0, infinity) is half closed, whereas the "interval" R is either closed or open, depending on how you look at it. I'm not positive I'm remembering this correctly, but I believe there is a topological theorem that says such functions (mapping from different types of intervals) is not possible, for a continuous function anyway.

Naturally, someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

-Dan

- October 24th 2006, 08:12 AM #5

- Joined
- Nov 2005
- From
- New York City
- Posts
- 10,616
- Thanks
- 9

You are wrong topsquark.

The idea is that is the countinuum as does . To see a prove of this using a variation of the Diagnol argument look here.

Now, by the countinuum hypothesis since and we must have,

.

The countinuum hypothesis provides us that there**does**exists a bijection between the two sets. However, whether is is possible to explicity state one, even via Axiom of Choice might not be possible (but I think yes).

- October 24th 2006, 08:44 AM #6

- Joined
- Nov 2005
- From
- someplace
- Posts
- 14,972
- Thanks
- 4

- October 24th 2006, 09:03 AM #7

- Joined
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 3

- October 24th 2006, 09:20 AM #8

- Joined
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 3

- October 24th 2006, 09:29 AM #9

- Joined
- Nov 2005
- From
- New York City
- Posts
- 10,616
- Thanks
- 9

- October 24th 2006, 09:37 AM #10

- Joined
- Nov 2005
- From
- someplace
- Posts
- 14,972
- Thanks
- 4

- October 24th 2006, 02:51 PM #11
If we can biject (0,1] with R, then certainly we can [0,1).

Now define a function from (0,1] to (0,1):

0,1] \to (0,1) \\

x \in (0,1] \Rightarrow \left[ {\exists n} \right]\left( {x \in \left( {\frac{1}{{n + 1}},\frac{1}{n}} \right]} \right) \\

f\left( x \right) = x + 1 - \frac{1}{n} - \frac{1}{{n + 1}} \\

\end{array}

" alt="

\begin{array}{l}

f0,1] \to (0,1) \\

x \in (0,1] \Rightarrow \left[ {\exists n} \right]\left( {x \in \left( {\frac{1}{{n + 1}},\frac{1}{n}} \right]} \right) \\

f\left( x \right) = x + 1 - \frac{1}{n} - \frac{1}{{n + 1}} \\

\end{array}

" />

Show that that is a bijection. Then finish the problem with you function.

- October 25th 2006, 12:43 PM #12

- Joined
- Nov 2005
- From
- New York City
- Posts
- 10,616
- Thanks
- 9

I do not know what Plato was attempting to do but when I saw that union and I had a revealation.

If you can biject,

and then you can biject,

Thus, you divide your interval as,

And you can create a bijection between any adjacent to each other.

That means, the union of these bijective maps (there are many thus the set is well-founded ) will create a bijection,

I am too lazy to work on a procedure but I got the idea from seeing what Plato wrote. (I hope I did not say the same thing).