Suppose that a functionis twice differentiable and both
are continuous, also suppose that
, show that
such that
.
Proof so far.
By the Taylor's Theorem, we know thatwhere
is a number between 0 and x.
So we have
Let, then
.
Is this right? Thanks.
Suppose that a functionis twice differentiable and both
are continuous, also suppose that
, show that
such that
.
Proof so far.
By the Taylor's Theorem, we know thatwhere
is a number between 0 and x.
So we have
Let, then
.
Is this right? Thanks.
There's something wrong with this question, if the inequalityis supposed to hold for all
. For example, the function
satisfies the hypotheses of the question but not the conclusion.
The best you can realistically ask for is that there exists some neighbourhood of the origin, say, such that
whenever
.
With that amendment to the question, your proof is partially correct. But there's a defect in it. The problem is that your choice ofdepends on x. You need to adjust the proof so as to get an estimate of the size of
that does not depend on x. This is possible because you are told that f'' is continuous. That means that it is bounded in any closed bounded interval. So given the interval
there exists M>0 such that
for all x in that interval. You can then use M in place of
in your proof, define
, and the proof will work nicely.
No! – becausedoes satisfy an inequality of that form in a neighbourhood of the origin. It just doesn't satisfy such an inequality globally, which is what you were previously asking for.
To get the right sort of example here, you need to ask how the proof of the first part of the question could go wrong. What you should notice is that it depended crucially on f''(x) being bounded in a neighbourhood of the origin. So you need to look for a candidate for f''(x) that is unbounded near the origin. But it must have a continuous integral f'(x). The sort of function that might do the job is. Try integrating that twice and see if it gives a function f(x) with the required properties.
Claim:satisfies the hypothesises but the inequality
do not hold in any neighborhood of the origin.
Proof so far.
Now,, so
I need to show that in any neighborhood of the origin,
Givenand
for some
, we have
But how would I get a positive number on the right hand side? Thanks.
Do this by contradiction. Suppose that there is a neighbourhood U of 0, and a constant c>0, such thatfor all x in U. Then in particular that would hold for all positive x in U, so that
whenever
. Square both sides, divide by x^3, and you see that
. But since U is a neighbourhood of 0 it must certainly contain points x satisfying
. That contradiction shows that no such neighbourhood U and constant c can exist.