Hi! I am currently trying to find a formula which solves the problem:
on x and
for , where
I do not have a clue how to do this. How can i handle the ? Does anybody have ideas for a solution?
EDIT: meaning the laplacian of u!
Hi! I am currently trying to find a formula which solves the problem:
on x and
for , where
I do not have a clue how to do this. How can i handle the ? Does anybody have ideas for a solution?
EDIT: meaning the laplacian of u!
Thank you for your answer. But i really would like to know how to solve it... I mean there is a formula for the case without cu. It hast to somehow work out to find a formula for this case. How can we somehow detour the cu? Anybody got ideas? i would be very thankful.
I got an idea but I've never tried it before and don't even know if it's applicable but desperate times call for desperate measures. We can solve:
by taking the single Fourier Transform of both sides with respect to x. This results in an ODE in t:
That's solvable via an integrating factor. We solve for and then invert the transform to obtain the solution. Well, how about multiple Fourier Transforms? There are such transforms you know. First solve your problem via Fourier Transforms for a single dimension, if that works, then ramp it up to two dimensions and take the Double Fourier Transform and see if that's tractable, if so then maybe you can ramp it up to n dimensions.