a) Suppose thatand
converge to the same point. Prove that
as
.
b) Show the converse is false.
Again as usual... some kind of explanation to help me understand this helps alot... :)
Printable View
a) Suppose thatand
converge to the same point. Prove that
as
.
b) Show the converse is false.
Again as usual... some kind of explanation to help me understand this helps alot... :)
For part a) i would use thedefinition of limits and it should follow directly. For part b) you just need to show a counter example. Maybe look at
ok that was how I started it... thanks for the info...
I finished part a). Thanks for the help. Now about part b). First what exactly would the converse be? I know its If X then Y becomes If Y then X. I was thinking maybe by showing something like subtraction is not commutative. Like if X - Y0 is not the same as Y - X
0.
The converse is: Suppose thatthe
&
have the same limit.
Try this counterexample.
Note: we are not given that the sequences converge, only that their difference is null.
The answer is no, the limit must be the same for both sequences.
Suppose that.
That means that almost all the terms ofare ‘close’ to
; almost all the terms of
are ‘close’ to
; and almost all the terms of
are ‘close’ to
.
Supposethen
.
But how can almost all of the three sequences be with in an-distance of its limit?