My question is attached. Thanks...

Printable View

- Oct 25th 2008, 11:19 AMtsal15More telescopic sums
My question is attached. Thanks...

- Oct 25th 2008, 06:42 PMKrizalid

Hence, - Oct 25th 2008, 06:56 PMKrizalid
Here're another solutions with somewhat advanced techniques.

- Oct 25th 2008, 07:28 PMtsal15
- Oct 25th 2008, 08:17 PMtsal15
- Oct 25th 2008, 08:17 PMKrizalid
- Oct 27th 2008, 09:08 PMtsal15
Can anyone else shed some light on this predicament?

Where did Krizalid use as the antidifference? also does the whole solution change much if Krizalid was to evaluate instead of And if Krizalid hasn't used the antidifference, could someone show me how to use the antidifference whilst using telescopic sums method to evaluate the finite

sum

Also using the method of telescopic sums, can someone evaluate the following finite sum using the provide antidifference?

antidifference :

(Crying) - Oct 28th 2008, 07:02 AMJhevon
i'll try

Quote:

Where did Krizalid use as the antidifference?

Quote:

also does the whole solution change much if Krizalid was to evaluate instead of

Quote:

And if Krizalid hasn't used the antidifference, could someone show me how to use the antidifference whilst using telescopic sums method to evaluate the finite

sum

Also using the method of telescopic sums, can someone evaluate the following finite sum using the provide antidifference?

antidifference :

(Crying)

- Oct 28th 2008, 07:51 PMtsal15

Well, I'll give an example which might make it easier. My lecturer is bad at teaching it to me, so hopefully it doesn't pass on (Speechless).

is found, using an*antidifference*expression for its summand. By*partial fractions*: The 2nd expression is a difference exactly as needed. So summand sequence { } = { } has antidifference { } = { }. So,

Tell me if you want more information. - Nov 1st 2008, 11:30 PMtsal15
I'm putting this thread up again so that I can get someone to help me. urgent help needed. Thank you all.

- Nov 2nd 2008, 05:25 PMtsal15
- Nov 2nd 2008, 05:38 PMtsal15