ok, yep i see.Quote:

Originally Posted byThePerfectHacker

so then if we split the integration into 2 regions, can't we just write this as the answer for part (b)?

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/1121/picture6yb5.png

Printable View

- August 23rd 2006, 06:54 PMsarahismeQuote:

Originally Posted by**ThePerfectHacker**

so then if we split the integration into 2 regions, can't we just write this as the answer for part (b)?

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/1121/picture6yb5.png - August 23rd 2006, 07:01 PMThePerfectHackerQuote:

Originally Posted by**sarahisme**

if replaced by becomes, so it is symettrical in the xz plane. Thus, that is valid. - August 23rd 2006, 07:08 PMsarahismeQuote:

Originally Posted by**ThePerfectHacker**

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/4...ure8fr3.th.png

as for part (c), i am still struggling with it,

for part (c) i get a graph like this (which is y = +/- sqrt(x-x^2)

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/9...ure7yv1.th.png

and so we want to integrate

0<=x<=1

0<=y<=sqrt(x-x^2)

but when i try to convert to polar coordinates i end up in a mess.... :(

i think thats almost right? :S - August 23rd 2006, 07:30 PMThePerfectHackerQuote:

Originally Posted by**sarahisme**

(I am just cautioning you, I do not know all the specific rules for manipulating polar coordinates, I might be wrong). For example, when radius can be negative, when it cannot, .... Hate multivarible calculus, so informal :mad: )

I do not understand your second problem, rephrase.

as for part (c), i am still struggling with it,

for part (c) i get a graph like this (which is y = +/- sqrt(x-x^2)

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/9...ure7yv1.th.png

and so we want to integrate

0<=x<=1

0<=y<=sqrt(x-x^2)

but when i try to convert to polar coordinates i end up in a mess.... :(

i think thats almost right? :S[/QUOTE] - August 23rd 2006, 07:42 PMsarahisme
ok rephrase, umm... i drew this graph http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/9...ure7yv1.th.png

which is a graph of y = +/- (x-x^2)^(1/2)

now i want to integrate over that circle, right? so then i want to integrate over

0<=x<=1

0<=y<=sqrt(x-x^2)

then i want to convert to polar coordinates.

coverting 0<=x<=1 is easy enough, it just gives you 0<=r<=1/cos(theta)

but i can't seem to convert 0<=y<=sqrt(x-x^2) to polar coordinates - August 23rd 2006, 07:43 PMThePerfectHackerQuote:

Originally Posted by**sarahisme**

The most efficient way to solve this problem is with a Jacobain substitution. Since the circle is off center you can place it into the center (origon) by a basic substition of x for u+1, that will move the coordinate axes to the left 1 unit and substitute y for v because you are not changing anything.

Doing it your way.

Thus,

Thus,

Finished. I looks rather simple in polar form. - August 24th 2006, 01:12 AMsarahisme
ok i think i almost have it now....

for part (b) i get:

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/1121/picture6yb5.png

for (c) i get this answer: