A great refresher. I'm actually working on those tonight, since in series and sequences the limits come back!! I was hoping they would disappear after the derivative
Could I just check that my answer to this question is correct? Well, can I check that the d in my answer is correct at any rate!
Give an e d proof that the function
f(x) = (x^2 + 1)/(x + 1)
is continuous at x = 1.
I got d=min(1, 1.5e)
Thanks!
Delta-Epsilon proofs well-past my BC calc days when I was taking an introductory proofs class. I assume that many individuals going into or emerging of Calc just do not have evidences down sufficient yet to be able to whip one out.
To show is continuous at , you need to show , i.e. that . Working on the second inequality we have
It would now help us if we had an upper bound on , to give us the maximum value of . If we bound (say), that gives
and to get an upper bound on we can use the Triangle Inequality
So that gives
Therefore choosing and reversing the process will finish the proof.
Hello! I hope its right to ask here, since i wanted to use a example from the pdf file, I am just using the proof of example 3 to show my problem.
I almost understand every single step to make the proof, the mainproblem is this step:
|x^2 - 25| = |x + 5||x - 5| < 11|x-5|
I know to get the 11|x-5|, but i dont get why it is less than my original function? In fact, its one of the first times i really work with inequallities, could someone explain me this little simple step? i solved |x+5| for 11, and thats why i can replace |x+5| with 11 which gives me 11|x-5|, but why is this new function < than my old function? arent both functions the same until i put my delta in?
I was taking an introductory proofs class. I think that most people going into or coming out of Calc just don't have proofs down enough yet to be able to whip one out.Luxury Goods Store
I understand that a little bit but I am having a hard time with how to start my proof.
wholesale nike shoes
Cheap Nike Jordan Shoes
Cheap Air Yeezy 2
thanks for the nice paper! so in example 3 do you choose delta=1 arbitrarily and M is equal to the upperbound of 11? can you explain further what the meaning of the M derivation is?
for instance if you choose in ex 3 delta=0.1 instead of 1 then would get M=10.1 and define delta as min{0.1, 10.1} and is that an equivalent proof?
do most mathematicians learn this very quickly?
The idea is that as long as your x is sufficiently close to the c value, then you are guaranteed for your function to be within your tolerance of . So yes, the value was chosen arbitrarily. Any number smaller than this will also work as we know this value works.
A proof of a formula on limits based on the epsilon-delta definition. An example is the following proof that every linear function f(x)=ax+b (a,b in R,a!=0) is continuous at every point x_0. The claim to be shown is that for every epsilon>0 there is a delta>0 such that whenever |x-x_0|<delta, then |f(x)-f(x_0)|<epsilon fap turbo 2