Yep. That's it. Good job. It is easy if you spot it. Those are the fun ones.

Printable View

- Jun 9th 2008, 05:35 PMgalactus
Yep. That's it. Good job. It is easy if you spot it. Those are the fun ones.

- Jun 9th 2008, 05:46 PMMathstud28
Here is one, have fun with the simplicity

- Jun 9th 2008, 06:29 PMtopsquark
- Jun 9th 2008, 06:30 PMMathstud28
- Jun 9th 2008, 08:13 PMMathstud28
- Jun 9th 2008, 10:46 PMNonCommAlg
- Jun 10th 2008, 07:41 AMMathstud28
Here are two simple ones

and

- Jun 10th 2008, 09:21 AMMathstud28
- Jun 10th 2008, 10:49 AMMathstud28
For the first one

First I let

I then made the sub, let

so as

So we have that

So by subbing we have

Now there are a few ways this could have been done, but the easiest is the Root/Ratio laws test trick

which then by termwise division gives

So

For our second limit

multiplying by the conjugate gives

Now by breaking it up we get

now seeing that

Grouping we get

So then we have that

- Jun 10th 2008, 10:55 AMMoo
Hi,

I've got a question for

Assuming that x tends to 0 from the right (>0), , while .

So we can neglect 3x with regard to

Therefore, the limit is :eek:

Also, I think you should be patient, we're not all in the same GMT and we're not as available as you are. So if no one answers within 2 hours, it's not a catastrophe... :) - Jun 10th 2008, 11:01 AMMathstud28
Haha thanks for pointing that out, I fixed that, if you look back I just literally stopped. I went and made a sandwich and when I came back I started on the second and didnt finish the first (Itwasntme)

As for thse second one

Quote:

So if no one answers within 2 hours, it's not a catastrophe...

- Jun 10th 2008, 11:06 AMMathstud28
Ok, here are two more

This first one I did yesterday on another website, so if you have seen it, dont spoil it..not that its that hard (Thinking)

and the other is

- Jun 10th 2008, 11:35 AMPaulRS
- Jun 10th 2008, 11:43 AMPaulRS
- Jun 10th 2008, 11:52 AMMathstud28