[SOLVED] Simple Harmonic Motion

**Evales** · May 30th 2008, 11:56 PM

How do you prove that a function shows that something is in SHM if the equation isn't in the form:

x = Acos (kt + b)

Is a graph would be acceptable or is there a mathematical way to do this?

**mr fantastic** · May 31st 2008, 01:42 AM

Originally Posted by Evales

How do you prove that a function shows that something is in SHM if the equation isn't in the form:

x = Acos (kt + b)

Is a graph would be acceptable or is there a mathematical way to do this?

Post the function.

**Evales** · May 31st 2008, 01:45 AM

x = sin t + [(3)^(1/2)]cos t

**topsquark** · May 31st 2008, 08:09 AM

Originally Posted by Evales

How do you prove that a function shows that something is in SHM if the equation isn't in the form:

x = Acos (kt + b)

Is a graph would be acceptable or is there a mathematical way to do this?

(Edited version)

The equation you have written is one way to define harmonic motion. So if your trial function cannot be put into this form, then it does not represent a SHO.

On the other hand you can define simple harmonic motion as $x"(t) = -Ax(t)$ . By taking small displacements from equilibrium for many physical systems you will find it is a SHO. (Usually you need to do a Taylor expansion to prove this. The linear coefficients in the series needs to be 0 and the quadratic coefficient needs to be negative. The condition on the linear term is automatic around an equilibrium point, so many systems have this kind of behavior.)

For your function
$sin(t) + A~cos(t)$
you can easily see that it is the (linear) sum of two SHO functions, so it is also a harmonic oscillator.

-Dan

**CaptainBlack** · May 31st 2008, 08:14 AM

Originally Posted by topsquark

For your function
$sin(t) + A~cos(t)$
you can easily see that it cannot be put into $cos(kt + b)$ form.

You might easily be able to see that it cannot be put in that form, but I can easily see that it can

.

RonL

**Evales** · May 31st 2008, 08:21 AM

Originally Posted by CaptainBlack

You might easily be able to see that it cannot be put in that form, but I can easily see that it can

.

RonL

Any way of enlightening me?

**topsquark** · May 31st 2008, 09:02 AM

Originally Posted by CaptainBlack

You might easily be able to see that it cannot be put in that form, but I can easily see that it can

.

RonL

Yeah, I was just coming back to fix that.

-Dan

**topsquark** · May 31st 2008, 09:11 AM

Originally Posted by Evales

Any way of enlightening me?

$x = sin(t) + A~cos(t)$

$x' = cos(t) - A~sin(t)$

$x" = -sin(t) - A~cos(t) = -x$

So this is a harmonic oscillator.

Or
$sin(t) + A~cos(t) = \sqrt{1 + A^2}~sin(t + \phi)$
(where $\phi$ is a constant) which is a sine function and hence a harmonic oscillator.

(This is from the more general:
$a~sin(t) + b~cos(t) = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2}~sin(x + \phi)$
where
$\phi = tan^{-1} \left ( \frac{b}{a} \right )$
for $a \geq 0$
and
$\phi = tan^{-1} \left ( \frac{b}{a} \right ) + \pi$
for $a < 0$ )

-Dan

Thread: [SOLVED] Simple Harmonic Motion

LinkBack

Thread Tools

Display

[SOLVED] Simple Harmonic Motion

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

Simple Harmonic Motion

Simple Harmonic Motion

Simple Harmonic Motion

Simple Harmonic Motion

simple harmonic motion

Search Tags