http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-he...1&d=1211427884

Printable View

- May 21st 2008, 08:44 PMszpengchaohelp with this integral problem
- May 21st 2008, 10:56 PMkalagota
for the first one, it just follows directly from by taking the definite integrals in all parts (since integral preserves the direction of the inequality). Also note that constants can go out of the integral sign.

for the second part, since , the inequality does not change i.e. and you can take the integrals.

the next two are applications.. you can do it. - May 22nd 2008, 12:09 AMIsomorphism
First apply parts to get,

[That is because since as ]

We claim

First observe that

So

Thus claim proved by sandwich theorem...

So

EDIT: I realised this halfway through...(Worried) My proof is incomplete... I assumed (1) f is differentiable (2) f'(x) > 0.... Let me think about it a little more.... - May 22nd 2008, 06:29 AMkalagota
as i have said, the questions are just applications of the previous.

note that, is*continuous*in a**closed**and**bounded**interval, then you can use Maximum-Minimum theorem, that is is also bounded. Also, is integrable.

Let be real numbers such that for . Applying the first and second facts, we have (since )

i just wonder if it equal or unless - May 22nd 2008, 01:44 PMIsomorphism