Yop,
I've noticed that04/05/08: Today, I have made many threads for question. Thanks for all the help!
Well, keep
Hence,
From here, you can get and
I believe you meant to say the chain rule. and using the quotient rule for this question is long and pointless
This is slightly off topic, but seeing as Airs question has already been answered I doubt anyone will mind.
Just have a comment on your signature, you do realise that is multi-valued, I'll give an alternative proof of what you have written in your signature.
you can write as for any integer n.
so becomes
Bobak
I agree that the quotient rule is long and pointless, but it may be good to know that it can be done various ways. However, I did mean Power Rule. When we differentiate it, we end up using the chain rule any, for both the power rule and quotient rule.
Thanks for the input on the signature. Your adjustments to it somewhat makes sense.