Please for some help with this integration problem.
i.e.
integral ((a x^4 + b x^2 + c)^–½) dx
Printable View
Please for some help with this integration problem.
i.e.
integral ((a x^4 + b x^2 + c)^–½) dx
Are you certain it is not,
??
I havn't done any intergration yet, but what I remember from calculus is to rationalise the denominator
Don't know if that helps...
Thanks for the rationalize approach. I will look into that.
The problem is based on predicting the rotation of a solid body after any given time. As far as I know there is no yet found solution. The integration is done numerically on a computer. I am desparately trying to get a theoretical formula. Alas, I am not that great with integration; I am at GCE A-level.
The equation is actually correctly stated.
Maybe there reason why it is done numerically is because it cannot be precisely computed!
There are cases like that so do not be supprised.
Ok, I will continue with the computer method.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker
I actually broke down the numerical method into this itegration and a matrix inverse. I expect that this approach have been attempted before, and hoped against.
Thanks for your expertise.
I have a broken down the original equation using partial fractions
Using the roots of a quadratic equation, let
and
Therefore becomes
Trying pratial fractions,
Therefore
Whenthen
and
Likewise
So the original becomes
Expanding to avoid imaginary values
The new form is
How can this proceed further? I noticed that it does not fall exactly in the arcsin value for the integral
Don't quote me on this.
I don't have my book with me at the moment, but the integral in question (I think!) appears in my Mechanics book. If I remember correctly, the integral can be reduced to an elliptic integral. They have no closed form.
-Dan
I had a good feeling somebody was going to mention that!Quote:
Originally Posted by topsquark
But as far as my post #5 is correct. That is why they used numerical methods.
The equation was not correct :( due to the ± issue of the square root. I will try to re-formulate the equation keeping the sign in mind. Consequently, the result I gave in post one would be rather unsolvable.
I also looked at Elliptic Integral and Jacobian Elliptic Functions. I could not follow Closed Form.
You are right: This integral form is done in numerical methods.
I don't know if your still working on it, but maybe this may help The Integral Calculator
Wow, this is great.Quote:
Originally Posted by chancey
Thanks.
I think that I finally understand the closed form and the ellipsoid concept
Firstly, the first equation is not of a 'function' therefore the area under the graph would not be closed, and to explain it more vividly: the eqution is that of an ellipse!
EDIT: I think that the arctan integral is only valid for a range of x<1
Well, I did the equation for this over, if any is interested in helping. I am putting it in the Advance Topics section.