Prove the identity

I'm a little lost where to begin on this one. Does anyone have any tips for proving these identities?

Printable View

- February 25th 2008, 08:56 PMTI-84Trig Identity Proof
Prove the identity

I'm a little lost where to begin on this one. Does anyone have any tips for proving these identities? - February 25th 2008, 11:14 PMmr fantastic
- February 25th 2008, 11:22 PMTI-84
I did

Hows it look compared to yours? - February 25th 2008, 11:32 PMmr fantastic
Well, that's a much better way. (Clapping)

I'd make just a couple of small changes so that the solution agrees with the standard setting out of an identity proof:

R.H.S.

And here's where we reach the fork in the road because you need to keep working with the R.H.S.

= L.H.S.

Do you see the*style*required? - February 25th 2008, 11:45 PMTI-84
Question. Can you work with both sides when proving an identity, as long as they don't interfere with one another.

- February 25th 2008, 11:51 PMmr fantastic
Well, I guess you

*can*..... but it's not good form in my opinion. Usually if you want to do that, you can instead use it to see how the LHS (or RHS) needs to continue.

In my opinion, trig identities should follow the format:

This side (LHS or RHS as required) = whatever it is

= blah blah

= yada yada

= ho hum ho hum

.

.

.

= the other side (RHS or LHS as required).