the following equation is a hyperbola,
5x^2 + 38x - 8xy - 22y - y^2 + 47 = 0
and i need to know how to translate and rotate it so that it is in the standard form, AX^2 + BY^2 = 1
does anyone have any ideas??? any help would be great.
i don't think i need any trig equations, my lecturer said to use a diagonalise function, using eigenvales and vectors. but i dont know how to 'translate' the function so that it can be rotated using eigenvalues. etc. cheers anyway. could u possibly suggest anything else.
There, then, is a nice lesson in providing the actual problem statement. I suppose I could have guessed in the calculus section that you would not be using elementary analytic geometry methods, but please go read your first post and point to where that is obvious. The rule is this, the more accurate the problem statement, the more useful information concerning your personal efforts, the better the response.
Let's see what you get.
sorry for not being more clearer, i hope my second post didn't sound nasty because that wasn't intended. anyway thanks for that link very useful however it doesn't consider the 38x and 22y term could you possibly help me there. i hope im being clear. lol
Let,
and
.
Then the coniccan be expressed in matrix form as
.
Letwhere
is a column matrix to be determined. Then
and so:
(sinceis real symmetric) where
.
Sinceis invertible there exists a unique matrix
such that
. With this choice of
you have:
.
The substitutioncorresponds to a translation of the origin to the point with coordinate matrix
.
All the dirty calculational details are left to you ......
You forgot the 'squared' in each term.....
Otherwise, I get the gist and it looks good.
One thing ....
I'd write it asetc. where
and
are the rotated coordinates.
And you understand the relationship between the unrotated coordinates and the rotated ones .....where P is as defined in the link I gave you and
.
For practice, I'd advise checking using the technique TKHunny initially suggested .....
(Caveat emptor: My arithmetic is as bad as anyone's ..... but I'm pretty sure everything (that is, C,etc.) is OK. And, since I'm lazy, I checked the eigenvalues using my TI-89 so I'm certain they're OK!)