If f(x) = ln(ln(1-x)), then f'(x) =
a) -1/ln(1-x)
b) 1/[(1-x)ln(1-x)]
c) 1/[(1-x)^2]
d) -1/[(1-x)ln(1-x)]
e) -1/[ln(1-x)^2]
Printable View
If f(x) = ln(ln(1-x)), then f'(x) =
a) -1/ln(1-x)
b) 1/[(1-x)ln(1-x)]
c) 1/[(1-x)^2]
d) -1/[(1-x)ln(1-x)]
e) -1/[ln(1-x)^2]
how does the double ln work [ln(ln(...]
All 'ln's work the same. It's just an application of the chain rule.
[f(g(h(x)))]' = f'(g(h(x)))*g'(h(x))*h'(x)
If f, g, and h are all the same, it just looks funny, it doesn't work any differently.
?
you use the chain rule.
Just a matter of applying the chain rule as others said. and of course, we assume 1/(anything) is defined and what not...
Ya others already said it, but if you are new to this,solve any such problem like this :
When you see ln (>something here<), at first step dont worry about >something here< just write 1/>something here< on paper. Now look at that >somethin here< it could be another function, say sin(>more something<), again forget what ever is inside parentheses just write derivative of sin (that is cos....) Keep on proceeding until you run out of functions.
Example:
say you are asked to differentiate
Yuck! Ugly function but don't worry...
Start Identifying functions from the >outermost< parts.
What I do?
***I tell myself, hey looks like some Y^4 ,so I write down:. Now let's fill "............"
***Now I see what's inside, hey looks like some(This is not the old Y, I am using Y as a variable!). I say to myself, I know it's derivative, it's
, so I write down
.
***Proceeding like this I notice next up is sin Y and its derivative is cos Y. So now I can happily write
Hope you get the idea :D
I know it looks complicated but it is just a matter of practice. So can you complete my answer ??
Hope you do well :)
Good explanation of the chain rule guys! I always liked using the word "junk" when teaching the chain rule. Junk can contain a carrot, and you would have to take the derivative of carrot and multiply that by junk.