Hey sepoto.

You best look at the quotient rule where d/dx (u/v) = [vu' - uv']/v^2 where u and v are functions of x.

Results 1 to 8 of 8

5*Thanks*

- November 5th 2013, 08:45 PM #1

- Joined
- May 2011
- Posts
- 133
- Thanks
- 2

## dQ/dt

I am starting with an equation:

to be solved for

My solutions manual has given up this hint to me:

Does anyone know what rules were applied to get the equation into the form above? I looked into the quotient rule to see if I could make sense out of what happened but I don't see it yet.

Thanks in advance...

- November 5th 2013, 09:21 PM #2

- Joined
- Sep 2012
- From
- Australia
- Posts
- 5,921
- Thanks
- 1547

- November 5th 2013, 10:18 PM #3

- Joined
- May 2011
- Posts
- 133
- Thanks
- 2

- November 6th 2013, 12:21 AM #4

- Joined
- Sep 2012
- From
- Australia
- Posts
- 5,921
- Thanks
- 1547

- November 6th 2013, 02:11 AM #5

- Joined
- Nov 2013
- From
- Australia
- Posts
- 231
- Thanks
- 49

## Re: dQ/dt

Chiro is right, product rule and quotient rule will both give the same answer. And the answer given is correct.

d/dx (u/v) = [vu' - uv']/v^2

u=at

u'=a

v=(1+bt^2)^3

v'= 3(1+bt^2)^2 * 2bt

Can you do it now?

Hint when you get near the end: (1-3)/4 = (1/4) - (3/4)

- November 6th 2013, 11:25 AM #6

- Joined
- May 2011
- Posts
- 133
- Thanks
- 2

## Re: dQ/dt

So by the quotient rule if I follow it then the resulting equation should be something like:

I'm trying to factor it out and reduce it down now to what is supposed to be the answer:

I'm still working the problem to see how one might transform to the other.

- November 6th 2013, 01:12 PM #7

- Joined
- Nov 2013
- From
- Australia
- Posts
- 231
- Thanks
- 49

## Re: dQ/dt

Yes what you have done so far is good.

now pretty up the numerator a little and factorise out a*(1+bt^2)^2

then cancel out (1+bt^2)^2 (top and bottom)

Collect like terms and it is finished.

I don't know how they thought the hint would work I thought that was the answer that they wanted.

You have do do more work to get it in the form of the hint.

Maybe it might have been useful if you had done it using the product rule.

- November 6th 2013, 01:48 PM #8

- Joined
- May 2011
- Posts
- 133
- Thanks
- 2