Thread: Integrate (2-3x)^-2

Hello

Would someone please tell me what method I should use to integrate the following.



I have tried writing the numerator as the derivative of the denominator, but then I'd have an f(x) to compensate for. I thought of using partial fractions, but haven't been able to write this as the sum of two fractions. I'm wondering if I have to use another method, substitution or by parts.

Thank you.

Originally Posted by Furyan

Hello

Would someone please tell me what method I should use to integrate the following.



I have tried writing the numerator as the derivative of the denominator, but then I'd have an f(x) to compensate for. I thought of using partial fractions, but haven't been able to write this as the sum of two fractions. I'm wondering if I have to use another method, substitution or by parts.

What is the derivative of

How does that answer your question?

Originally Posted by Furyan

Hello

Would someone please tell me what method I should use to integrate the following.



I have tried writing the numerator as the derivative of the denominator, but then I'd have an f(x) to compensate for. I thought of using partial fractions, but haven't been able to write this as the sum of two fractions. I'm wondering if I have to use another method, substitution or by parts.

Thank you.

Now let and the integral becomes . Go from here.

Originally Posted by Plato

What is the derivative of

How does that answer your question?

The derivative is

So the answer is

Thank you so much. I was getting really confused and was thinking in terms of when I should have just been using the chain rule in reverse.

Originally Posted by Furyan

The derivative is
So the answer is
Thank you so mtergablesuch. I was getting really confused and was thinking in terms of when I should have just been using the chain rule in reverse.

Yes that my whole point!
I would tell students, forget rules, just know derivatives.
In indefinite integrable problems of what is it the derivative?

That is the whole and complete point!!

If you can find a function such its derivative is the given function, then you are done! Adding a actually means nothing to those of us who's research is on the integral.

Originally Posted by Plato

Yes that my whole point!
I would tell students, forget rules, just know derivatives.
In indefinite integrable problems of what is it the derivative?

That is the whole and complete point!!

If you can find a function such its derivative is the given function, then you are done! Adding a actually means nothing to those of us who's research is on the integral.

I'm sorry but I completely disagree with you. Yes, know that integration is essentially the opposite process to differentiation, but without knowing some rules like substitution, you are stuck trying to think of derivatives out of thin air. We have these rules, which are easily derived, to make our lives easier, not more difficult.

Originally Posted by Prove It

I'm sorry but I completely disagree with you. Yes, know that integration is essentially the opposite process to differentiation, but without knowing some rules like substitution, you are stuck trying to think of derivatives out of thin air. We have these rules, which are easily derived, to make our lives easier, not more difficult.

If the point is "to make our lives easier, not more difficult" we should learn to use something like WolfranAlpha. There is even a cell phone app. In fact, I predict that within twenty years calculus textbooks will not have a section on Techniques of Integration. Given the tools available that have been for twenty five years (CAS, calculators, etc), it is hard to see why that is not already true.

Look at to OP. It is sad if one looks at that and does not see it as a derivative form. I find it truly sad that I have seen on this very board some who have to use a substitution to see as an , even without any more effort.