Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Verifying Stokes' Theorem

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Sep 2010

    Verifying Stokes' Theorem

    Problem- Given the vector field F= <yx, 0, x>, calculate both \oint_{\partial S}Fds ​and \iint_Scurl(F)dS over the portion of the plane \frac{x}{2}+ \frac{y}{3}+ z = 1 where x, y, z > 0, oriented with an upward normal vector.

    I took \nabla x F to get <0, y-1, z> which I dotted with nG(x,y)= < \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{3},1> of my parameterization of the plane G(x,y) = (x, y, 1-( \frac{x}{2}+ \frac{y}{3} ) to get \frac{y-1}{3} +z. I then computed \int_0^1 \int_0^{3-3z} \frac{y-1}{3} +z dy dz to get \frac{1}{2} which I believe is correct.

    My issue lies in finding \oint_{\partial S}Fds. I tried defining \partialS as the sum of a set of three parameterized line segments c1 c2 c3 in the xy-plane, however none have a z-component, so when I took F(c1)c'1 , F(c2)c'2, and F(c3)c'3 they all ended up as <0, 0, 0>. I tried defining \partialS in the yz-plane, but I met the same <0, 0, 0> dot products, so \oint_{\partial S}Fds​ and all of the three scalar line integrals composing it equated to be 0. I feel like I'm doing something wrong.

    Any help?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Nov 2012
    Jacksonville, FL

    Re: Verifying Stokes' Theorem

    Three parametrized line segments are indeed how you would break up the boundary of S. But one each lies in the xy-, xz-, and yz-planes. Try drawing a picture like the one I've added below.

    Verifying Stokes' Theorem-image.jpg
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Apr 21st 2012, 06:02 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: May 14th 2010, 10:04 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: Apr 3rd 2010, 04:41 PM
  4. Flux integrals - verifying Stokes Theorem
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Aug 20th 2009, 08:58 AM
  5. Stokes' Theorem
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Jun 20th 2008, 06:34 PM

Search Tags

/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum