technically, your method uses the product of limits ...
since does not exist, the product of limits does not show that the overall limit is zero ... you would have to use the fact that , hence the need for the squeeze theorem.
I was presented a question on
as x approaches infinity.
My approach was to separate the amplitude
My explination was since the amplitude was going to zero as x approached infinity, the limit was 0.
I was told this is not correct at all, which i fail to understand how my approach is not correct at all. In fact i can not imagine a single situation with cos(x) where if the amplitude is zero, the over all cos function would do anything but go to zero.
The problem, I was told, was that i did not use the squeeze theorem. i was expected to show
I do not understand how my approach was not correct at all vs using the squeeze theorem. Anyone explain where my logic if flawed?
technically, your method uses the product of limits ...
since does not exist, the product of limits does not show that the overall limit is zero ... you would have to use the fact that , hence the need for the squeeze theorem.
Thanks for replying.
Since
is zero and the does not exist. Then is the problem with my approach. This is why I would have needed to state that Cos(x) was bounded so that it would have existed or used squeeze on the whole function?
Thanks for clearing that up,
Rod