My question has to do with changing improper rational functions to the sum of a polynomial and proper rational function. If it matters, the context of this is inverse Z-transforms.
My textbook says to do this by doing polynomial long division with the polynomials written in **reverse** order. But I have assignments where the solutions do the long division in the original order, and if I tried doing it in reverse order, I get an answer with different signs that I can't easily factor.
Textbook example (reverse order):
Assignment example (normal order):
Now, if I do the assignment example using the reverse order, I get:
...which I can't factor out the denominator in the nice way it was done in the normal order example.
So what's the deal here? Does the order I do the division not matter, and I should just choose the one that gives me the easier answer to work with? Or is one right and the other wrong?
No I'm not saying your textbook is incorrect.
I just avoided long division altogether which I think is a good idea for that particular example.
On reflection I think my post was unhelpful.
When you do need to use long division you can think of your variable as 1/z and write out your problems starting with the highest power of 1/z. Is this what you mean by reverse order?
I think you might have misunderstood the textbook example, because the denominator of the proper fraction in the result is the same as the original denominator. When you applied the method, that didn't happen.