Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Dense-in-itself set

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    2

    Dense-in-itself set

    Let $\displaystyle E\subset \mathbb{R}^1$ be a non-empty countable set. Suppose $\displaystyle E$ has no isolated points, prove that $\displaystyle \bar E\backslash E$ is dense in $\displaystyle \bar E.$

    It is difficult, isn't it?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,036
    Thanks
    272

    Re: Dense-in-itself set

    I think the best approach might be to suppose that $\displaystyle \bar E\backslash E$ is not dense in $\displaystyle \bar E$. Start unraveling the definitions and see what you can prove about the set E.

    - Hollywood
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    2

    Re: Dense-in-itself set

    I could not see any property of $\displaystyle E$, if I assume $\displaystyle \bar E'\backslash E$ is not dense in $\displaystyle E$.

    I argue as follows. We need only prove the closure of $\displaystyle \bar E'\backslash E$ contains $\displaystyle \bar E.$
    Suppose then $\displaystyle x$ not in the closure of $\displaystyle \bar E'\backslash E$, then there exists a $\displaystyle \tilde \delta>0$ , such that for any $\displaystyle \delta\in (0,\tilde \delta)$, the ball $\displaystyle B(x,\delta)\subset (E'\backslash E)^c=E^{'c}\cup E$. Since $\displaystyle E$ is countable, we see $\displaystyle B(x,\delta)\cap E^{'c}\neq \emptyset.$ This, by definition, means $\displaystyle x\in E^{'c-}$ (the closure of $\displaystyle E^{'c}$).

    Here, I could only prove $\displaystyle x\in E^{'c-}$, but not $\displaystyle x\in E^{'c}.$

    Would you help me out? Thank you.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21,797
    Thanks
    2828
    Awards
    1

    Re: Dense-in-itself set

    Quote Originally Posted by xinglongdada View Post
    Let $\displaystyle E\subset \mathbb{R}^1$ be a non-empty countable set. Suppose $\displaystyle E$ has no isolated points, prove that $\displaystyle \bar E\backslash E$ is dense in $\displaystyle \bar E.$
    Another way to define being dense-in-itself to to say that the set contains no isolated points.

    Thus is $\displaystyle E$ dense-in-itself?

    Can $\displaystyle \overline{E}\setminus E$ be dense-in-itself?
    Last edited by Plato; Oct 26th 2012 at 01:35 PM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    2

    Re: Dense-in-itself set

    Yes, indeed they are equivalent. $\displaystyle E\subset E'$ is equivalent to saying $\displaystyle E$ has no isolated points.

    I do not see how to prove the statement.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  6. #6
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21,797
    Thanks
    2828
    Awards
    1

    Re: Dense-in-itself set

    Quote Originally Posted by xinglongdada View Post
    Prove that $\displaystyle \overline{E}\backslash E$ is dense in $\displaystyle \overline{E}.$
    Well frankly I was confused by the title of the thread and the question above.

    If you want to prove the above question, can you show that

    $\displaystyle \overline{\overline{E}\setminus E}=\overline{E}~?$
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  7. #7
    Member
    Joined
    Oct 2012
    From
    israel
    Posts
    200
    Thanks
    14

    Re: Dense-in-itself set

    E has no isolated points so every point x in cl(E) is limit of a sequence xn of different elements of E.E is countable so in the neigborhood of each xn there is yn in cl(E)-E.yn is converging to x,so we have our claim.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    2

    Re: Dense-in-itself set

    Yes, I want to prove this.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    2

    Re: Dense-in-itself set

    Quote Originally Posted by hedi View Post
    E has no isolated points so every point x in cl(E) is limit of a sequence xn of different elements of E.E is countable so in the neigborhood of each xn there is yn in cl(E)-E.yn is converging to x,so we have our claim.

    Why " in the neigborhood of each xn there is yn in cl(E)-E"? I know only
    $\displaystyle B(x_n,1/n,x_n+1/n)\subset E^{-c}\cup (\bar E\backslash E)\cup E.$ Thus, by the countability of $\displaystyle E$, I could only see $\displaystyle B(x_n-1/n,x_n+1/n)$ contains an element $\displaystyle y_n$ lies in $\displaystyle \bar E^c$ or $\displaystyle \bar E\backslash E$?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  10. #10
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21,797
    Thanks
    2828
    Awards
    1

    Re: Dense-in-itself set

    Quote Originally Posted by xinglongdada View Post
    Why " in the neigborhood of each xn there is yn in cl(E)-E"? I know only
    $\displaystyle B(x_n,1/n,x_n+1/n)\subset E^{-c}\cup (\bar E\backslash E)\cup E.$ Thus, by the countability of $\displaystyle E$, I could only see $\displaystyle B(x_n-1/n,x_n+1/n)$ contains an element $\displaystyle y_n$ lies in $\displaystyle \bar E^c$ or $\displaystyle \bar E\backslash E$?
    I HATE THESE TRICKY PROOFS.
    Notation: $\displaystyle \mathcal{B}(x;\delta)=\left( {x - \delta ,x + \delta } \right)$ where $\displaystyle \delta>0$.
    Note that if $\displaystyle t\in E$ then $\displaystyle \mathcal{B}(t;1)$ contains a point $\displaystyle x_1\in E\setminus\{t\}$ because $\displaystyle E$ has no isolated points.
    But $\displaystyle \mathcal{B}(t;1)$ is uncountable so $\displaystyle \left( {\exists y_1 \notin E} \right)\left[ {y_1 \in \mathcal{B}(t;1)} \right]$

    So if $\displaystyle \delta_1=1$ then $\displaystyle \exists\delta_2$ such that $\displaystyle \mathcal{B}(t;\delta_2)}\subseteq\mathcal{B}(t; \delta_1)}$ so that $\displaystyle x_1\notin \mathcal{B}(t;\delta_2)}$ AND $\displaystyle y_1\notin \mathcal{B}(t;\delta_2)}$.

    Can you see why I HATE this?

    There is a sequence of points $\displaystyle \left( {x_n } \right)$ in $\displaystyle E$ such that $\displaystyle \left( {x_n } \right) \to t$.

    There is a sequence of points $\displaystyle \left( {y_n } \right)$ in $\displaystyle E^c$ such that $\displaystyle \left( {y_n } \right) \to t$.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    2

    Re: Dense-in-itself set

    Then you prove that $\displaystyle E\subset \partial E.$ How to prove the statement then?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  12. #12
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21,797
    Thanks
    2828
    Awards
    1

    Re: Dense-in-itself set

    Quote Originally Posted by xinglongdada View Post
    Then you prove that $\displaystyle E\subset \partial E.$ How to prove the statement then?
    Read reply #7.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  13. #13
    Member
    Joined
    Oct 2012
    From
    israel
    Posts
    200
    Thanks
    14

    Re: Dense-in-itself set

    since E has no isolated points, the open sets in cl(E) are uncountable so they must intersect cl(E)-E,because E is countable.(notice that cl(E) is uncountable).
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  14. #14
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,036
    Thanks
    272

    Re: Dense-in-itself set

    A friend of mine came up with this proof having to do with perfect sets. By definiton, a set E is perfect if E=E', the set of limit points of E. A set is perfect if it is closed and has no isolated points. And if a set is perfect, it is uncountable. This Wikipedia article has some background:
    Derived set (mathematics) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    You can also find a proof that a perfect set is uncountable on the web.

    Ok. Suppose that $\displaystyle \bar E\backslash E$ is not dense in $\displaystyle \bar E$. Then there exists $\displaystyle x\in\bar{E}$ and $\displaystyle \epsilon>0$ such that $\displaystyle B(x,\epsilon)\cap(\bar E\backslash E)$ is empty. So $\displaystyle \bar{B}(x,\frac{\epsilon}{2})\cap(\bar E\backslash E)$ is empty. This means that in $\displaystyle \bar{B}(x,\frac{\epsilon}{2})$ every point of $\displaystyle \bar{E}$ is also a point of E. So $\displaystyle \bar{B}(x,\frac{\epsilon}{2})\cap\bar{E}$ is a subset of E. But $\displaystyle \bar{B}(x,\frac{\epsilon}{2})\cap\bar{E}$ is closed, and since it is a subset of E, contains no isolated points. So $\displaystyle \bar{B}(x,\frac{\epsilon}{2})\cap\bar{E}$ is perfect, and therefore uncountable. This is a contradiction, so $\displaystyle \bar E\backslash E$ is dense in $\displaystyle \bar E$.

    - Hollywood
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: Aug 28th 2011, 02:33 AM
  2. Q is dense in R
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Oct 2nd 2010, 01:23 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: Jun 20th 2010, 09:12 PM
  4. Dense
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Apr 10th 2010, 01:16 PM
  5. Co(A)is dense in L1(A)
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Apr 29th 2009, 07:46 AM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum