First, read about telescoping series. Then prove that
using properties of ln.
Edit: The right-hand side should be .
First, read about telescoping series. Then prove that
using properties of ln.
Edit: The right-hand side should be .
Hmm, I could not parse this sentence. Edit: OK. I parsed it, but I am not sure how to represent this series as a partial fraction.
What do you claim about this expression? Obviously, .
I am not sure partial fractions are necessary here. Simplify the expression under the sum using the formulas for logarithm of product and quotient.
Yes, this is the best representation.
I was doing it as follows.
...
Attachment 24517
The horizontal axis corresponds to arguments of ln and the vertical axis corresponds to terms of the series. Blue dots (k, n) denote ln(k) in the nth term, and red dots (k, n) denote -2ln(k) in the nth term. Then three dots on the same vertical line correspond to ln(k) - 2ln(k) + ln(k) = 0, so only dots surrounded by the dashed line remain.
This all means that I was wrong about the partial sum in post #2.
Ok so the series represented as telescopic series is ln1 - ln2 + ln(n+2) - ln (n+1).
How would i go about finding the sum of the telescopic series? Would i use log laws again so that the telescopic series is ln1/2 + ln(n+2)/(n+1)?? If so what would the answer to the sum be??