Thread: Separation of Variables

Hello, I'm a little stuck on this problem:

Find a solution to the differential equation subject to the initial conditions.

dz

dt = te^z , through the origin.

---

Here is how I tried to solve the problem:

dz

dt = te^z

multiply both sides by dt, and then divide both sides by e^z to get like variables with like variables:

dz

e^{z = tdt}

Take the integral of both sides:

(integral sign) 1/e^z dz = (integral sign) t dt

substitution
w = e^z
dw = e^z dz

(integral sign)1/w dz = (integral sign) t dt

ln|w| = t²/2 + C

ln|e^z| = t²/2 + C

exponentiate both sides to get rid of the natural log:
e^ln|ez| = e<sup>t2/2 + C

the e and the natural log cancel out</sup>
e^z = e^{(t^2)}e^c

e^z = Ce^{(t^2) ----(where C is just a constant)}

Now this is where I am stuck. Have I done it correctly so far? What do I need to do next? Please help. Thank you.

Hmm...


You can't do that w substitution as you will get but there is no in the integral to cancel it out

I would agree that you should just use the result given by jgv115 but you can use the substitution.

You should end up with

Originally Posted by a tutor

I would agree that you should just use the result given by jgv115 but you can use the substitution.

You should end up with

You can use the result IF you mutliply the top and bottom by first.

Originally Posted by Prove It

You can use the result IF you mutliply the top and bottom by first.

I see, you need to multiply by 1 before it works..

Just in case a picture also helps...



... where (key in spoiler) ...

Spoiler:

... is the chain rule. Straight continuous lines differentiate downwards (integrate up) with respect to the main variable (in this case t), and the straight dashed line similarly but with respect to the dashed balloon expression (the inner function of the composite which is subject to the chain rule).

_________________________________________

Don't integrate - balloontegrate!

Balloon Calculus; standard integrals, derivatives and methods

Balloon Calculus Drawing with LaTeX and Asymptote!

I'm sorry. I am still not sure what substitution to use. How would I end up with my substitution as 1/w² ​??

Originally Posted by NeedsHelpPlease

I'm sorry. I am still not sure what substitution to use. How would I end up with my substitution as 1/w² ​??

is not your substitution it is the result of doing the substitution you started.

You had

so



and then

Originally Posted by a tutor

is not your substitution it is the result of doing the substitution you started.

You had

so



and then

, which should be easy to integrate...