I'll try and help you out, I've never really used cylindrical co-ordinates but I do know that they're defined by three properties; the radial distance from the z-axis, the azimuth (angle to) of the point and height z.
Your equationwould result in a straight line on the z-axis since the distance from the z-axis isn't mentioned. Are you sure the equation is correct as it clearly doesn't correspond with the diagram.
Try it, let,
and
on this grapher, the result is just a straight line.
surf_graph_cylin
Hmmm, I understand what you're saying, but if r isn't explicitly defined surely that means it's either irrelevant henceor it's true for all values of r:
, why would the equation
imply that
?
I'm not criticising you, just brainstorming. =)
I think an appropriate parametric representation would be:
where:and
That does seem a bit silly but it's all I've got at the moment.
I chose(and
for no particular reason other than it gives a reasonable plot (and produces something like the surface shown in the original question) whereas
does not. Just for example really.
If there are no limits specified then I thinkis correct, afterall if you were asked to plot, in [2D],
for example, you would draw, or at least imply, a line of infinite length, not a single point at
![]()
If the diagram weren't present I'd think the answer I gave was correct but I'm thinking that some information is missing. Given how the diagram looks
where:and
![]()
...doesn't seem possible.