A question about simplifying lim..

My question might sound a bit strange, maybe not, but it is of great importance for me that someone answers it thoroughly...

Let's say we have the following sequence >>

a(n) := n / [(n^2) - 4]

if i were to calculate the lim n --> infinite i would 1 as the result.

but if i were to divide both the numerator and the denominator with n the sequence would change to a(n) := 1 / [n - (4/n)] and then the lim n --> infinite would be 0. Now the sequence is not convergent 1 but a nullsequence.

Why is convergent 0 correct and convergent 1 false? As correct answer i was told 0, but why? why not 1? must i always try and divide + simplify?

2 >> and is there a clear way to simplify before executing the lim? For example, every variable in the numerator must be of power 1 or something?

I hope my question is clear for you and you can help me. thank you :)

Re: A question about simplifying lim..

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**nappysnake** My question might sound a bit strange, maybe not, but it is of great importance for me that someone answers it thoroughly...

Let's say we have the following sequence >>

a(n) := n / [(n^2) - 4]

**if i were to calculate the lim n --> infinite i would 1 as the result.** not true ...

but if i were to divide both the numerator and the denominator with n the sequence would change to a(n) := 1 / [n - (4/n)] and then the lim n --> infinite would be 0. Now the sequence is not convergent 1 but a nullsequence.

Why is convergent 0 correct and convergent 1 false? As correct answer i was told 0, but why? why not 1? must i always try and divide + simplify?

2 >> and is there a clear way to simplify before executing the lim? For example, every variable in the numerator must be of power 1 or something?

I hope my question is clear for you and you can help me. thank you :)

what makes you think the nth term converges to 1 ?

, not 1 ... the term in the denominator is dominant.

Re: A question about simplifying lim..

whoa, wait a second..what do you mean with dominant? I really don't know anything about this.. :|

Re: A question about simplifying lim..

is the denominator dominant because (n^2)-4>n for n>3? how could i specify the dominant term?

Re: A question about simplifying lim..

for an nth term of a sequence in the form of a quotient ... when the degree of the denominator > degree of the numerator, the limit of the sequence as n tends to infinity is zero.

you should already be familiar with this concept after studying the end-behavior of rational functions in prior algebra / precalculus courses.

Re: A question about simplifying lim..

and if the degree of the numerator > degree of the denominator then the limit with an n that tends to infinity is infinite?

unfortunately i never had the opportunity to learn, at least from the school or university books up until now i never did anything like that before..

Re: A question about simplifying lim..

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**nappysnake** and if the degree of the numerator > degree of the denominator then the limit with an n that tends to infinity is infinite?

that would be correct.

unfortunately i never had the opportunity to learn, at least from the school or university books up until now i never did anything like that before..

then go learn something more ...

Pauls Online Notes : Calculus II - Sequences

Re: A question about simplifying lim..

cool, thank you for the link! :)

Re: A question about simplifying lim..

I've read the info on the link and the calculus I page, it made many things clearer. Thanks! :D