prove or desprove by example

1.prove or desprove by example:

a)

b)prove or desprove that 'uniformly' continuous in R

c)if f(x) monotonicly decreasing in and then f(x)>0 for

d)f,g are continues in [a,b] if then f=g in [a,b]

regarding the first one i couldnt find a value for which the supremum is 1

for part a) i cant say if its correct or not

?

Re: prove or desprove by example

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**transgalactic** 1.prove or desprove by example:

a)

b)prove that

'uniformly' continuous in R

c)if f(x) monotonicly decreasing in

and

then f(x)>0 for

d)f,g are continues in [a,b] if

then f=g in [a,b]

regarding the first one i couldnt find a value for which the supremum is 1

That makes no sense. The supremum does not depend upon a "value". It should be obvious that 1 is an upper bound for this. Is there a smaller upper bound? That is, is there a number such that for all x> 1? What do you get if you solve that inequality for x?

Quote:

for part a) i cant say if its correct or not

?

Re: prove or desprove by example

ok so 1 is the upper bound and in order to prove that its supremum ,we need to show

that its the smallest upper bound.

suupose 1 is not the smallest and .

now i think we should use

but i cant use lhopital law here like normal variable because we have to get rid of [x].

fo x>0

x-1<[x]<x+1

so >

so i have the result of a smaller limit.

how i know the result of the bigger one

?

Re: prove or desprove by example

Instead of using the L'Hopital's rule, I would follow the suggestion above and solve [x]/([x] + 1) < t for x. If [x] means the integer part of x, I would solve it when x is an integer.

Re: prove or desprove by example

so you want me to replace [x] with x,and prove that t is its supremum

?

Re: prove or desprove by example

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**transgalactic** so you want me to replace [x] with x,and prove that t is its supremum

?

No, Quote:

Originally Posted by **emakarov**

I would follow the suggestion above and solve [x]/([x] + 1) < t for x

I have not said anything about proving that t is a supremum. The suggestion is to solve the inequality on integers, so you can remove the square brackets.

Re: prove or desprove by example

ahhhh instead of R i solve it on N

but how to make the transition back to R

?

Re: prove or desprove by example

Re: prove or desprove by example

ahhh if i will prove for integer that then t cannot be an upper bound and specially supremum.

ok the integer group is not bounded from top so

but i dont know how to continue and i dont know where to put "t"

i only remmember the part when N is not bounded and we put it to be larger then the fracture.

another way i remmber is

so for every there is for which every

i can open this

to

so i can choose

and

correct?

Re: prove or desprove by example

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**transgalactic** ahhh if i will prove for integer that

then t cannot be an upper bound and specially supremum.

ok the integer group is not bounded from top so

but i dont know how to continue and i dont know where to put "t"

You should review how to solve linear inequalities such as x / (x + 1) > t. Without it, frankly, talking about limits, continuity, or any other calculus topic looses meaning. (I am assuming this is the issue because this thread has four suggestions to solve this inequality, and my last post explains how this would help solve the problem.)

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**transgalactic** another way i remmber is

so for every

there is

for which every

i can open this

to

so i can choose

and

correct?

There is sense in this, but, again, I think it's meaningless doing limits without a solid grasp of algebra.

Re: prove or desprove by example

i know how to solve innequalitties

you didnt say which one.i have presented two ways of continuing this solution

could you say which one to follow

?

be more spesific

Re: prove or desprove by example

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**emakarov** We know that 1 is an upper bound of

. The idea is to prove that anything less than 1 is

*not* an upper bound. Suppose t < 1. Then t is not an upper bound iff

**the inequality** is true for some

. Well, the suspicion is that it is true for infinitely many

, and even true for infinitely many positive integers. So, try to solve

**this inequality** when x is an integer and see if this is true.

.

Re: prove or desprove by example

ahhhhhhhhhhhhh ok

x/(x+1) >t

x>t(x+1)

x-tx>1

x>1/(1-t)

0<t<1 from the data in the question

but how it proves that t is not upper bound

?

Re: prove or desprove by example

Since 0<t<1, 1/(1-t) is well-defined positive number. You can take x to be any integer greater than 1/(1-t), and then [x] / ([x] + 1) > t, disproving that t is the upper bound of {[x] / ([x] + 1) | x >= 0}.

Re: prove or desprove by example

ahh i understand now part a

**regarding part b:**

i know a guide line that any curve above f(x)=x is not uniformly continues

so we must prove that there is so for all

there is x,y in R which and

so i choose

but i know only that

i need to find some delta expression so will be greater that it.

so the result of the x,y value input will give use greater then 2.

but here i have smaller then delta only expression

what do?