Two curves are orthogonal if their tangent lines are perpendicular at each point of intersection. Are the given below families of curves orthogonal trajectories of each other? (In other words, is every curve in one family orthogonal to every curve in the other family?)
Then the problem goes on to give me five geometric graphs, one of which is presumably the graph of the equations shown above. Other than the fact that we are studying implicit differentiation, which I have attempted with the hope that I would see a negative reciprocal relationship between these two equations, I have no idea how to do this. I did not find a negative reciprocal relationship, so my instinct that these are not orthogonal, but I don't trust my calculations.
Can anybody help?
Thanks.
Let me post a little more on this question:
First the derivatives:
So far, so good (I think). But then, I get to the final step, which is to solve one of the original equations for y and then plug that value into the other equation. I should then come out with a negative reciprocal of the first derivative if they are orthogonal. Here goes:
And then, plugging into derivative #2:
This has no relationship (that I can see) to , which might just mean that the two functions are not orthogonal.
Can somebody please take a look at this and confirm whether I have done this correctly or if I have missed the boat?
Thanks.
Hello,
You have ... (1) and ... (2)
If ... (3) then the two curves are othogonal to each other.
From (1) & (2) you may think that (3) is not true, but actually it is!
The reason is that your derivatives shouldn't have parameters(a&b).
In other words, we want and in terms of x & y only without a & b.
Can you find them in terms of x&y only?
Well, you have two ways:
First way:
Rewrite your curves as :
... (1)
... (2)
Now, differentiate (1) & (2) implicitly with respect to x. The parameters will vanish.
Second way(Which I do not like) :
From (1), you have a in terms of x&y, substitute it in your . Similary for (2).
There may be a more elegant way to do this, but I see no reason to abandon the a's and the b's.
These two equations are circles. The top one is the set of circles tangent to the y axis and passing through (0, 0). Similarly the second set of circles "expand" up the y-axis. this means that the two sets of circles have two points of intersection. It is at these points that the two equations must be orthogonal.
So where do they intersect? I get that the circles always intersect at the origin and at the point (if I did it right)
The first derivatives must be in the form at those two points. Lots of algebra ahead doing it this way.
-Dan