Maybe letting them as such and not expanding will help you?
Find the nth derivative of by calculating the first few derivatives and observing the pattern that occurs.
So, here's what I've done so far:
The pattern of the exponents is clear to me, but the pattern of the coefficients is not. Can anybody help me? Thanks.
All of these replies are helpful. Unknown008, that helps a lot to not multiply them out. I can see the sequence now clearly. What I don't know is how to write this in mathematical notation. The other two posts are a little beyond my abilities. I don't understand the notation used by CoffeeMachine, and I'm not sure that I agree with VonNemo's (although it might be right). Can anybody help me with how to write this out? Thanks.
You might not be familar with the factorial notation, which is:
For example,
In the derivative, you put n! in the numerator, but you get everything till 1, but that's not in the derivative! So you divide by another factorial, such that the factorial in the denominator will cancel out anything that should not be in the numerator.
Example, you want 9 x 8 x 7 x 6
But you have 9!
What you do, is divide by 5!, so that:
What is unneeded after 6 is cancelled out.
I'm somewhat familiar with factorial notation, but not to the extent that I feel comfortable writing this like you have done. Here is what I am going to do:
Is the Leibnitz notation correct? They are throwing this notation at us in the book and in lecture, but never really telling us how to write it for ourselves.
Thanks.
If , then what you've found is the kth derivative . So if that's what you wanted, then it's absolutely fine. But wasn't your question, as stated in the OP, to find the nth derivative of ? If so, then you need to replace by in the equation you have found for the kth derivative of , and then note that . The product evaluates to