You can use this website to check your answers.
Be sure to click the show steps button.
Yeah that was a total typo on my part. You can even see in the formula I typed there was no integral, I don't know why I put it there. My tired-ness is catching up with me. But apart from that integral typo, it seems to be correct according to Plato's link.
And Plato, I typed in the second problem into that website and it said:
This is what I typed into the search box:
derivative of (x^3+1) ^tan x
You can just input the equation directly and wolfram will pull up the integral, limit, derivative, etc of the function without you having to say a word!
Also, you could do this,
Let
Now we can implicitly differentiate the left side and apply the product rule to the right side. Should clear everything up.
is true only for b a constant.
(Note the , not u(x). What you wrote:
" is not true even for b a constant.)
To differentiate use the fact that as Allencuz suggested.
There are two common errors made in differentiating something like :
1) Treat the base as a constant: .
2) Treat the exponent as a constant: .
The interesting thing is that the correct derivative is the sum of those errors!
I don't understand what you did when you played ln on both sides [what property did you use?]. I did, however do as you said and applied the product rule to the right side.
So what you are saying is that x^(3)+1 cannot be treated like, say, pi would for example. So if I had something like pi instead of x^(3)+1, the rule I used earlier would apply?