Results 1 to 2 of 2

Math Help - Green's Theorem Proof Misunderstanding

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Joined
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2

    Green's Theorem Proof Misunderstanding

    By the way, I also posted this in the Urgent Help section.

    Okay, I get the half that is normally explained in the books which is the same as on wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green's_theorem).

    This is the best that I can explain this:

    I understand the part of the explaination where integral of (P dx) = - double integral of (partial derivative of P with respect to y) dA.

    I don't, however, understand why on the other half, integral of (Q dy) = double integral of (partial derivative of Q with respect to x) dA, does not have a negative sign in front of one of the two halves.

    If essetially you are doing the same process twice, once with a type I region and the other time with a type II region, why does one half of the proof end up with a negative (which I understand) but not the other half?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Super Member Rebesques's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2005
    From
    At my house.
    Posts
    537
    Thanks
    10
    Depends on the orientation of the curve, i.e which point is the initial one. Here the minus is needed to travel along the boundary in the positive direction (anti-clockwise).
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Green's theorem proof
    Posted in the Differential Equations Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 15th 2011, 09:11 PM
  2. Green's Theorem
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 5th 2010, 07:57 PM
  3. Proof of Green's theorem in Apostol's book
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: April 26th 2010, 10:06 PM
  4. Green's Theorem
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 19th 2009, 11:29 AM
  5. Green's Theorem
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 26th 2009, 02:50 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum