Hi forum members, I've attached 2 limits I'm struggling to evaluate. could you give me a lead on it ? thanks in advance.
For the first one, you can find the limit of each term and sum them.
Since the degree of the numerator is less than the denominator's in each case, each term approaches . Hence, the limit is...
For the second one, it would be useful to rewrite it as to the power . The exponent here approaches , and any positive number to the power is...
The first one is wrong and the second one is misleading:
In the first one, the number of summands depends on n, which tends to infinity - that is why the limit of the sum does not equal the sum of the limits (only true when there is a fixed amount of summands!)
Instead, try evaluating a lower bound and an upper bound for the sum and then use the sandwhich theorem. I'll show you how to do the lower bound and you do the upper bound:
The smallest summand is , therefore, if we denote the sum by , we have that as . Try working the upper bound in a similar fashion.
For the second one, you can evaluate the expression inside the root as follows:
And then use a similar trick to get an upper bound for the expression, and finally apply the sandwhich theorem.
I should practice the sandwich rule more, would it be safe to say it is better to try the sandwich approach with sums ?
could that be used as the inequality for the sandwich ? for the first one and for the second one.