Is there in anything wrong/ambiguous about using for the nth integral of ?
[Got that idea from wikipedia article that says the multiple integration of a function in variables,
, over a domain D is represented by ]
If we want to represent the nth derivative of , then out of many we can write:
(Lagrange's notation).
(Leibniz's notation).
But what notation do we use for representing the reverse — that is, for the nth integral of the RHS?
You will also sometimes see for the nth derivative and for the nth anti-derivative. Of course, . If you use for the nth derivative, you could use for the nth anti-derivative.
TheCoffeeMachine, wouldn't the form you give be likely to be confused with the integral with respect to the nth coordinate variable?