Results 1 to 5 of 5

Math Help - Clarification needed regarding the meaning of normalization :)

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    56

    Clarification needed regarding the meaning of normalization :)

    Hi,

    I have a problem in understanding the conceptual meaning of normalization. I know that normalization is essentially to make an coefficient or vectors equaled to 1. However, I don't quite understand why we need normalization, the rules for normalization and the interpretation of normalization .

    Can people help me to clarify my thought?

    Thanks.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    MHF Contributor
    Prove It's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    11,495
    Thanks
    1396
    It's for the simple reason that when we "count" we need a unit. If we are "counting" vectors, we need to know the "unit" vector, so that we know what "1" is.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Super Member Failure's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2009
    From
    Zürich
    Posts
    555
    Quote Originally Posted by Real9999 View Post
    Hi,

    I have a problem in understanding the conceptual meaning of normalization. I know that normalization is essentially to make an coefficient or vectors equaled to 1. However, I don't quite understand why we need normalization, the rules for normalization and the interpretation of normalization .

    Can people help me to clarify my thought?
    From a dictionary of mathematical terms:
    normal form n. a canonical form to which a given structure or object may be reduced.
    normalize vb. to put into some normal form.

    Now, of course, "canonical form" is probably not any less in need of elaboration than "normal form".
    But the general idea behind "normal forms" is this: you have certain "mathematical objects" of a rather abstract nature, like functions, or direction in a space, or .. you name it.
    And you have certain syntactical representations of those mathematical objects. Ideally, the syntactical representation would be unique, so that one could decide about the equality or inequality of the mathematical objects represented by the two syntactical forms by just comparing the syntactical forms themselves. For example, you are given two functions, each defined by some rather elaborate term, and you are asked to check whether these two terms actually represent/define the same function or not.

    Similarly, a normalized vector is a unique representation of a particular direction in a given vector space. If you want to check whether two given vectors have the same direction, you might usefully normalize both of them (because this does not change their direction) in order to do so.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    56
    Thank you for both! I have got the sense in understanding normalization now!!!!!!!
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    56
    I just made a small donation to this site This site is awesome!! And I think we should establish a sub-forum for discussing economics mathematics !
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Normalization
    Posted in the Advanced Algebra Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: July 4th 2011, 10:33 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 28th 2009, 01:07 AM
  3. Normalization
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: September 30th 2009, 07:36 PM
  4. Clarification with differentiation needed
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 8th 2008, 12:48 AM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum