the only problem is i have to do it via method of substitution, i dont have to to use integration by parts

Printable View

- Jun 25th 2010, 08:55 AMraj007∫(sin⁻¹x)²

the only problem is i have to do it via method of substitution, i dont have to to use integration by parts - Jun 25th 2010, 09:27 AMAlso sprach Zarathustra
Let use integration by parts.

Let

Which gives us:

Using integration by parts again.

Let

So,

- Jun 25th 2010, 10:53 AMAlso sprach Zarathustra
By substitution:

let

so,

I let you finishing this (by parts)

I guess there is no escape from integration by parts... - Jun 25th 2010, 10:53 AMAlso sprach Zarathustra...
By substitution:

let

so,

I let you finishing this (by parts)

I guess there is no escape from integration by parts... - Jun 25th 2010, 07:32 PMraj007
i guess the same, i hope the question is misprinted in the substitution exercise,

thanks everyone for their time.