Attached is a problem I hand wrote. I don't get why on the first step, it has to be multiplied by -(1/2). is that part of a rule? Thanks!
Printable View
Attached is a problem I hand wrote. I don't get why on the first step, it has to be multiplied by -(1/2). is that part of a rule? Thanks!
simple substitution
let
then
which means that
so
I flipped through my textbook and it didn't say that it had to multiply (-1/2). How come it needs to multiply that? I'm still confused :(
You do know what the chain rule is? What we're looking for when we take
is some function
that when we differentiate it, it becomes
. In other words,
So to see why you need the -1/2 differentiate the answer and see what you get. You will notice that without the -1/2 you DO NOT obtain what was inside the integral!
Because when you make the substitution, you switch from integrating with respect toto integrating with respect to
. To do that you need to know how to write
in terms of
. Have you covered integration by substitution in class?
I understand that if I don't get (-1/2) it won't be the original problem and i do understand the chain rule.
if its the chain rule
should the anti differentiation of (-2t) = -2 [(t^2)/2] ?
Thanks!
So![]()