Hi, i have this question which i am unsure whether the answer is 0 or 2.

If x tend to 2-, I know the limit is 2.

How about if x tends to 2+? Please see image:

http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/2...0cma120q10.gif

Printable View

- March 30th 2010, 08:13 PMtottijohnFinding limit of discontinous function (graph)
Hi, i have this question which i am unsure whether the answer is 0 or 2.

If x tend to 2-, I know the limit is 2.

How about if x tends to 2+? Please see image:

http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/2...0cma120q10.gif - March 30th 2010, 09:02 PMProve It
- March 30th 2010, 09:20 PMtottijohn
0? But since 0 does not exist, is it 2?

- March 30th 2010, 10:38 PMProve It
Yes, the answer is 0.

You are finding out what APPROACHES as you are making approach a value. That value of need not be defined. - March 31st 2010, 02:51 AMHallsofIvy
?? 0 certainly does exist(Rofl)! You mean that the value of the function, at x= 2, is not 0. And that is irrelevant to the limit!

If you look carefully at the definition of limit you will see that we require only if . That "0< |x- a|" means that what happens**at**x= a is irrelevant. It is only what happens**near**the point (and, here, larger) that is important.

It is very, very important to understand that the value of a limit at a point has nothing to do with the value of the function at that point!

For example, f(x)= has limit 3 as x goes to 2. Now define g(x) to be as long as x is NOT equal to 2 and**any**value you want for x= 2. No matter what value you assign**at**x= 2, .

Sometimes students get the idea that "limit" is just another way of talking about the value of a function but that's only because "continuous" functions, which are**defined**as functions whose limit is the same as its value, are so easy to use. The function you have here is NOT contininuous at x= 2. In a very specific sense "almost all" functions are not continuous.