Is...
(1)
... so that all what you have to do is setting in (1) instead of and then multiply by ...
Kind regards
Hi,
Can someone suggest a short way of solving this? I'm doing it the regular way, that is, I took it's derivatives up to seventh degree, then put 0 into all of them, wrote a few terms from the Taylor series formula, then came up with a rather ugly general term (with 4 individiual terms before the sigma).
Is there a better-easier way of solving this?
Thanks.
Ok, thanks to both of you, but after putting 2x in place of t in the expansion of ln(1+t), how am I going to multiply this by x? Shall I just write the whole sigma formula multiplied by x? Would it be OK like that?
Sorry if this is obvious, but my mind seems to have stopped working after many hours of studying. Hope you understand.
Thanks.