Let

How can I prove that this function is not uniformly continuous in the Real Numbers?

Printable View

- January 23rd 2010, 08:44 AMadam63Uniform Continuity
Let

How can I prove that this function is not uniformly continuous in the Real Numbers? - January 23rd 2010, 10:56 AMdrumist
Are you looking for a rigorous epsilon-delta proof, or just a round-about proof? (for example, you can just show that the derivative is unbounded)

- January 23rd 2010, 11:03 AMadam63
I thought of your second suggestion, but I'm not sure that if a derivative is unbounded then the function is not uniformly continuous, for instance look at:

in [0,1] : it's uniformly continuous, but f'(x) is surely not bounded in this area. - January 23rd 2010, 11:07 AMdrumist
is not uniformly continuous over [0,1].

Edit: My mistake. It is. - January 23rd 2010, 11:12 AMHallsofIvy
- January 23rd 2010, 11:16 AMHallsofIvy
- January 23rd 2010, 11:17 AMKrizalid
- January 23rd 2010, 11:23 AMdrumist
I suppose I was mixing up my definitions of uniformly continuous and Lipschitz. Sorry for the confusion.

on [0,1] is uniformly continuous, but not Lipschitz.

Nevermind... making too many mistakes, will think through before I post again hahah. - January 23rd 2010, 11:31 AMHallsofIvy
- January 23rd 2010, 11:33 AMdrumist
Nevermind...

Sorry, had a few wires crossed in my mind. Sorry if it confused you at all, adam63. :P - January 23rd 2010, 12:02 PMadam63
No problem at all, everyone makes mistakes, especially in math ;) I was looking for help, and you tried your best. That can never be bad!

HallsofIvy: I liked your solution, although I don't get the 'picture' of the solution:

I need to find an Epsylon for which for every delta>0 :

|x1-x2|<delta ----> |f(x1)-f(x2)|>=Epsilon

now, if I create two sequences:

then:

.

How can I move on, in order to show that there is an Epsilon for which :

? - January 24th 2010, 03:54 AMadam63
Can anyone please help me with this? It's pretty urgent (Worried)

- January 24th 2010, 07:25 AMHallsofIvy
The formulas I posted show that, as x goes to infinity, the " you need in the definition of continuity, for a given " goes to 0. There is no one value of that works for all x.