Can someone explain to me the substiution which is made for these integrals, I never find out why, it is they just just do it, and have no reasoning, perhaps a little insight could help
Yes, I know you use that to arrive by substituting the denominator to get the natural log, however, I am one of those that want to know why rather than this is how you do it and the hows its goes with no reason. sorry to be a pain thanks for the input though.I just wanted to know how do you manage or who decided this will work, as in the reasoning.
who knows who came up with it? I don't.
math is like that sometimes. sometimes someone recognizes a pattern and applies it backwards to get somewhere. being very familiar with trig derivatives no doubt was a motivating factor here. seeing how that would work backwards might have led to such a method.
sometimes, you don't know where it came from or why someone would even think of that. yet you can't deny that it works, and that it is stunningly elegant.